Skip to content

· Private foundation

Guillermo J Valenzuela Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$509k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.3MHuman Services$425kArts & Culture$183kCivil Rights$159kRecreation & Sports$150kEducation$93kHousing & Shelter$82kEmployment$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $196k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE$300,000
UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE$41,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES SAN BERNARDINO$30,000
DESERT SANCTUARY INC$25,000
ARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION$25,000
ARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION$25,000
UJIMA INC$20,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO$20,000
DAVID A PAIGE FOUNDATION$10,000
CAL MATTERS$9,383
UJIMA INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 90% of grant dollars ($3.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 10% that went abroad ($382k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $308k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $25k → 14%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $25k → 14%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $25k → 14%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $25k → 14%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $25k → 14%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $25k → 14%DESERT SANCTUARY INC: $20k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $30k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CEN: $30k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CEN: $28k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CEN: $25k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 10% of all-years giving ($382k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Chile$382k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Guillermo J Valenzuela Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 86%.

Guillermo J Valenzuela Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 16 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$2.2M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+25%

Still filing today

56%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    The Desert Sanctuary Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $170k · revenue +41%
  • CalMatters
    3× · 2023–2025 · $159k · revenue +49%
  • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO
    7× · 2017–2025 · $143k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • HH
    HISPANIC HEALTH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $1.1M · revenue -61%
  • HP
    HEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION FOUNDA
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
  • AR
    ARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR FOUND
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
2
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
3
California Black Health Network

The Organization advocates for health equity by leading and facilitating convenings in all regions of California for the purpose of providing policy analysis, research and training that promotes best practices, which supports the creation…

—
4
Clinicas De Salud Del Pueblo Inc

Clinicas is the safety net provider for Imperial and Eastern Riverside Counties providing primary health care to low income and medically under served populations. We provide comprehensive, preventative and treatment services, pediatric,…

Health
5
Community Health Association Inland Southern Region

We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.

—
6
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
7
El Centro Del Barrio Inc

CentroMed is a network of integrated primary care clinics providing accessible services of superior quality.

Human Services
8
All Inclusive Community Health Cent

The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.

Health
9
Community Initiatives for Collective Impact

Our mission is to join diverse people, ideas, and resources to address the most pressing social and environmental justice priorities. We believe that the community concerns of Californias San Joaquin Valley (SJV) can only be addressed if…

Community Improvement
10
Active San Gabriel Valley

Active San Gabriel Valley (ActiveSGV) is a community-based environmental advocacy and public health non-profit organization. Our mission is to promote a more sustainable, equitable, and livable San Gabriel Valley.

Community Improvement
11
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
12
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center; the most unlike its peers is Youth Mentoring Action Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE: $382,000 · OtherUNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILEINLAND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES I: $288,367 · OtherINLAND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ICATHOLIC CHARITIES SAN BERNARDINO: $177,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES SAN BERNARDINOARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR FOUN: $150,000 · OtherARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR FOUNHEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION FOUNDA: $110,250 · OtherHEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION FOUNDAARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONUJIMA INC: $99,000 · OtherUJIMA INCTime For Change Foundation: $82,250 · Other+10 more: $215,000 · Other+10 moreHISPANIC HEALTH INSTITUTE: $1,110,691 · HealthHISPANIC HEALTH INSTITUTEReach Out: $130,000 · HealthReach Out+3 more: $65,000 · HealthThe Desert Sanctuary Inc: $170,000 · Human ServicesThe Deser…EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $137,500 · Human ServicesEL SOL NE…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $142,500 · Arts & CultureMALO MOTIVATING ACTION LEADERSHIP OPPORTUNITY: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC CHANGING LIVES: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCalMatters: $159,383 · Civil RightsONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $92,500 · EducationYOUTH MENTORING ACTION NETWORK: $15,000 · EducationInland Empire Community Foundation: $55,000 · PhilanthropySAHABA INITIATIVE INC: $20,000 · Religion
Other$1,604,367Health$1,305,691Human Services$307,500Arts & Culture$177,500Civil Rights$159,383Education$107,500Philanthropy$55,000Religion$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Desert Sanctuary Inc: $170,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetCalMatters: $159,383 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $142,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $137,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetReach Out: $130,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $92,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTime For Change Foundation: $82,250 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetInland Empire Community Foundation: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCoachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine: $25,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSAHABA INITIATIVE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetKVCR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetInland Behavioral & Health Services Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMALO MOTIVATING ACTION LEADERSHIP OPPORTUNITY: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING ACTION NETWORK: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMUSIC CHANGING LIVES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HISPANIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Desert Sanctuary Inc ↗
  • Who funds CalMatters ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Reach Out ↗
  • Who funds ARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Time For Change Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Inland Empire Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Coachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine ↗
  • Who funds SAHABA INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds KVCR EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Inland Behavioral & Health Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds MALO MOTIVATING ACTION LEADERSHIP OPPORTUNITY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH MENTORING ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC CHANGING LIVES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California EndowmentCA24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · IEHP Foundation · Regional Access Project Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Guillermo J Valenzuela Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Guillermo J Valenzuela Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Guillermo J Valenzuela Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Guillermo J Valenzuela Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Guillermo J Valenzuela’s filings →

    More from the funding graph