How much did GUGLIELMO FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Education$4.1MCivil Rights$300kReligion$209kYouth Development$167kHealth$138kAnimals$15kScience & Tech$12kRecreation & Sports$10kInternational$2kOther$1.2M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

alamo heights

2019

—

2020

—

2021

researchheights

2022

capital

2023

capital

2024

mcqueeney

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k7 grants · $21k
$10k–50k11 grants · $184k
$50k–250k7 grants · $783k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

YOUNG LIFE$167,000
SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST$130,000
BORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERSITY$121,000
CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT CASTLE HILLS$115,000
ST PETER THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$100,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$100,000
THE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION$50,000
MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES$46,000
LAUREL HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH WEEKDAY SCHOOL$25,000
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS$20,769
VET TRIIP INC$20,000
TEXAS BIOMEDICAL FORUM$12,000
BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION$10,000
STUDENT MOBILIZATION$10,000
THE ECUMENICAL CENTER$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 95% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.2M · 16 repeat orgs$876k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.2M

$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%

+31%

Still filing today

50%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $620k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationReligionCivil RightsAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TC
The Christian School at Castle Hills
7× · 2018–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +103%
Alliance Defending Freedom
2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue +117%
BL
Biblical Leadership for Excellence
5× · 2018–2024 · $40k · revenue +94%

Funded once

TA
Texas Agriculture Land Trust
one grant, 2023 · $100k
TB
Texas Biomedical Research Institutegraduated
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +68%
BR
Borderlands Research Foundation
one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education

Still Water Christian Ministries Inc

To offer Kingdom partners a holy and unforgettable experience at our Texas Hill Country retreat and camp facility highlighting the still waters of God's majestic creation.

Recreation & Sports

Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education

North Texas Christian Foundation

As the North Texas affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy

Valor Texas Education Foundation

Valor Public Schools educates the whole person in authentic communities for a full human life.

Education

Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

To be Texas' foremost champion of individual rights & freedoms through education & litigation.

Civil Rights

British American Foundation of Texas

BAFTX provides financial support to enable Texas students to fulfil their potential.

Philanthropy

Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education

Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education

Camp Fire Central Texas

Camp Fire Central Texas builds caring, confident youth and future leaders through hands-on science, outdoor experiences, and service to the community.

—

Baylor Research Institute

Faith based medical research organization bringing innovative treatment to patients through basic science, clinical trials, and health care effectiveness and quality of care research.

Health

The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Road Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Young Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

14/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$4,053,090Other$1,206,264Civil Rights$300,000Religion$209,000Youth Development$167,000Health$137,545Animals$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX30.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · The Charity Ball Association Of · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Phoenix Charitable Foundation · The Charles Butt Foundation · Circle Bar Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation Group Return · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable · Harvey E Najim Charitable

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GUGLIELMO FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Vet Triip.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~63 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 237408422 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Vet Triip, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 63 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 33% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Guglielmo Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Guglielmo Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GUGLIELMO FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Guglielmo Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

GUGLIELMO FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Guglielmo Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph