· Private foundation
Guglielmo Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $175k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $300k
- $250k+1 grant · $965k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT CASTLE HILLS | $965,000 |
| ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM | $100,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $100,000 |
| COMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC | $50,000 |
| THE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| WORLD VENTURE | $30,000 |
| SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST | $30,000 |
| MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| BORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS | $20,000 |
| BIBLICAL LEADERSHIP FOR EXCELLENCE | $15,000 |
| SCOUTING AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| STUDENT MOBILIZATION | $10,000 |
| CRU | $10,000 |
| ALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT CASTLE HILLS8× · 2018–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +120%
- YLYOUNG LIFE8× · 2018–2025 · $447k · revenue +39%
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM3× · 2023–2025 · $400k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- SPST PETER THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $100k
- TATexas Agriculture Land Trustone grant, 2023 · $100k
- TBTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTEone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To offer Kingdom partners a holy and unforgettable experience at our Texas Hill Country retreat and camp facility highlighting the still waters of God's majestic creation.
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
It is the mission of Texans for Vaccine Choice Education Foundation to provide information to the public regarding vaccine benefits and risks, and toinform the public about vaccine choice rights in the state of Texas. Our goal is to…
ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.
The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…
The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
The Cambridge School of Dallas was formed in 2001 and is a college preparatory, non-denominational christian school established for the purpose of providing academic excellence in a christ-centered environment.
Texans for vaccine choice exists to directly influence vaccine choice public policy and legislation
Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.
The purpose of sandy creek bible camp (texas youth camp, inc.) is to teach the gospel of jesus christ to children and adults while in a relaxed rural setting. the camp will provide opportunities for christian growth, fellowship and service…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Road Ministries and the most unlike its peers is McQueeney Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT CASTLE HILLS ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds THE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds VET TRIIP INC ↗
- Who funds Biblical Leadership For Excellence Inc ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL FORUM ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT ↗
- Who funds RISE RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( ↗
- Who funds STILL WATER CAMPS INC ↗
- Who funds BUSH TENNIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Phoenix Charitable Foundation · Circle Bar Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · San Antonio Area Foundation Group Return · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Guglielmo Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.