Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Growing Hope Globally

As a christian response to world hunger, GROWING HOPE GLOBALLY links the grassroots energy and commitment of the us agricultural community with the capability and desire of small farmers in developing countries to grow lasting solutions to hunger.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$622k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$14MReligion$1.0M
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $2,142,059 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,233,574 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $91,515 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $608k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$123,345
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD RENEW$621,643
MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE$451,167
CHURCH WORLD SERVICE$430,153
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$229,930
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$123,345
WORLD HOPE INTERNATIONAL$85,196
COVENANT WORLD RELIEF & DEV$65,000
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (USA)$54,845
CONVOY OF HOPE$50,000
NAZARENE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES$30,780
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE: $457k → 9%CHURCH WORLD SERVICE: $580k → 17%WORLD RENEW: $622k → 11%CONVOY OF HOPE: $100k → 15%EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH: $110k → 14%WORLD HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $85k → 9%LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF: $150k → 19%PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA: $87k → 15%MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE: $451k → 9%CHURCH WORLD SERVICE: $552k → 17%WORLD RENEW: $559k → 11%EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH: $103k → 14%WORLD HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $85k → 9%LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF: $149k → 19%MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE: $427k → 9%CHURCH WORLD SERVICE: $504k → 17%WORLD RENEW: $523k → 11%WORLD HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $85k → 9%LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF: $148k → 19%MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE: $356k → 9%CHURCH WORLD SERVICE: $495k → 17%WORLD RENEW: $478k → 11%WORLD HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $85k → 9%LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF: $144k → 19%MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE: $301k → 9%CHURCH WORLD SERVICE: $473k → 17%WORLD RENEW: $452k → 11%LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF: $126k → 19%MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE: $271k → 9%CHURCH WORLD SERVICE: $430k → 17%WORLD RENEW: $448k → 11%LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF: $123k → 19%MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE: $256k → 9%CHURCH WORLD SERVICE: $400k → 17%WORLD RENEW: $424k → 11%LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF: $110k → 19%MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE: $418k → 9%CHURCH WORLD SERVICE: $341k → 17%WORLD RENEW: $410k → 11%LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF: $99k → 19%UNITED METHODIST COMMITTEE ON RELIEF: $134k → 17%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $230k → 19%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $226k → 19%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $203k → 19%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $167k → 19%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $115k → 19%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $106k → 19%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $102k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
MO
KY
VA
MD
KS
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 13 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$15M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+214%

Still filing today

38%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    World Renew
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +47%
  • CW
    CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +192%
  • LW
    LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • WR
    WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $60k · revenue +214%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
2
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

3
Water Missions International

To honor god by developing, implementing, and sharing best-in-class safe water solutions that transform as many lives as possible, as quickly as possible.

International
4
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
5
World Compassion Network Inc

Assist the local church by responding globally to the needs of victims of disasters and poverty through disaster relief mission trips and compassion projects

Human Services
6
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
7
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
8
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
9
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

10
African Leadership and Reconciliation Ministries of Texas

Alarm exists to develop servant leaders in the african church and the community who reconcile and tranform lives affected by violent conflict and injustice.

11
Action Against Hunger - Usa

Aah-usa's mission is to save lives by preventing, detecting, and treating undernutrition, particularly during and after disasters and conflicts. from crisis to sustainability, we tackle the direct and underlying causes of hunger through…

International
12
World in Need International Inc

World In Need International was founded upon the belief that every individual has eternal significance and all people can be enabled to help themselves. Though the needs of the world are many, World In Need offers programs that are…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is North Park University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

World Renew — $3,916,742 · OtherWorld RenewMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE U S — $2,936,453 · OtherMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE U SCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $1,228,694 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA A CORP — $325,384 · Other+5 more — $836,156 · Other+5 moreCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $3,774,109 · InternationalCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INCLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $1,050,988 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INCWorld Hope International Inc — $590,531 · InternationalWorld Hope International Inc+2 more — $210,000 · InternationalNORTH PARK UNIVERSITY — $296,682 · Education
Other$9,243,429International$5,625,628Education$296,682

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWorld Renew — $3,916,742 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $3,774,109 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC — $1,050,988 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWorld Hope International Inc — $590,531 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH PARK UNIVERSITY — $296,682 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds World Renew
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC
  • Who funds World Hope International Inc
  • Who funds NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL17.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Lilly Endowment Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Growing Hope Globally funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph