Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Griffith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$173kHuman Services$146kArts & Culture$56kEnvironment$51kReligion$38kHealth$11kCrime & Legal$6kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $134k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$313k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOWMAN'S HILL WILDFLOWER PRESERVE$50,000
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES$25,000
CHILDREN FIRST$20,000
BUCKS COUNTY HERALD FOUNDATION$20,000
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK$20,000
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL$15,000
Individual grant recipient$13,500
JAMES A MICHENER ART MUSEUM$10,000
ARTYARD$10,000
CORINTH 13 CENTER$5,000
BARNARD COLLEGE$5,000
ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES$4,000
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH SOLEBURY$3,750
NEHEMIAH CENTER$2,505
NEW LONDON COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN FIRST: $20k → 22%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $3k → 16%NEW LONDON HOMELESS HOSPITALITY CENTER: $2k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $3k → 16%COMMUNITY YMCA: $1k → 6%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $2k → 16%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $2k → 16%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $2k → 16%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $2k → 16%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $2k → 16%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $2k → 16%NEHEMIAH CENTER: $2k → 16%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $11k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$271k · 17 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$271k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+107%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $62k · revenue +25%
  • EC
    Episcopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania
    2× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +24%
  • NC
    Nehemiah Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • The Friends of Foundation Academy Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +107%
  • WS
    WESTNINSTER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • WS
    WESTMINISTER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
12
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Princeton Day School Inc and the most unlike its peers is Artyard (Formerly Sprocket Arts). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Independent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsYmca Community CentersHomeless Services & ShelterLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%9%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr17%6%20–35yr15%16%35–55yr17%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr13%6%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr17%6%20–35yr15%9%35–55yr17%57%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,130

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EPISOCPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES — $70,000 · OtherEPISOCPAL COMMUNITY SERVICESST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $30,000 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCHBRYN MAWR COLLEGE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK — $20,000 · OtherBRYN MAWR COLLEGE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORKIndividual grant recipient — $13,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+21 more — $46,880 · Other+21 moreTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC — $61,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL…The Friends of Foundation Academy Inc — $50,000 · EducationThe Friends of Foundation Acad…BARNARD COLLEGE — $19,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGE+5 more — $6,000 · EducationEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania — $35,500 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Communi…Children First PA — $20,000 · Human ServicesChildren First PANehemiah Center Inc — $19,505 · Human ServicesNehemiah Center I…+2 more — $3,100 · Human ServicesBOWMAN'S HILL WILDFLOWER PRESERVE ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · EnvironmentBOWMAN'S HI…+1 more — $200 · EnvironmentBUCKS COUNTY HERALD FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Arts & CultureBUCKS COUN…SOUTHERN VERMONT ARTS CENTER INC PO BOX 617 — $15,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN V…JAMES A MICHENER ART MUSEUM — $10,000 · Arts & CultureJAMES A MI…ARTYARD (FORMERLY SPROCKET ARTS) — $10,000 · PhilanthropyHMS SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY — $6,000 · HealthALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC — $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $500 · Health
Other$180,380Education$136,500Human Services$78,105Environment$50,200Arts & Culture$45,000Philanthropy$10,000Health$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC — $61,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Friends of Foundation Academy Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania — $35,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChildren First PA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNehemiah Center Inc — $19,505 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $19,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN VERMONT ARTS CENTER INC PO BOX 617 — $15,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHMS SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY — $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LONDON HOMELESS HOSPITALITY CENTER — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRINCETON DAY SCHOOL INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER MONMOUTH COUNTY INC — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTWP-THE YOUTH MOVEMENT — $600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFORKIDS INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New JerseyPA21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · The McEwen Family Scholarship Fund at Modern Group Ltd · The Neubauer Family Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Independence Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Griffith Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • New London Homeless Hospitality Center47% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Griffith Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Griffith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph