Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grgich Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$153kInternational$78kHuman Services$15kYouth Development$14kHousing & Shelter$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kEnvironment$4kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$10,000
CROATIAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND$5,000
ST MARY'S CENTER - A FRIENDLY PLACE$2,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF ST HELENA$2,000
SANTA SABINA CENTER$2,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA ROSA$2,000
HANNA BOYS CENTER$1,500
RODALE INSTITUTE$1,000
CONNOLLY RANCH EDUCATION CENTER$1,000
SCHOOL SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS$1,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ST HELENA$1,000
ST HELENA MONTESSORI SCHOOL$500
EARLE BAUM CENTER OF THE BLIND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 79% of grant dollars ($229k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($60k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $500 → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
PA
CA
MD
DC
LA
AL

Beyond the US: 21% of all-years giving ($60k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Ukraine$60k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$274k · 22 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$274k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+18%

Still filing today

45%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
    5× · 2017–2022 · $106k · revenue +36%
  • CS
    CROATIAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +82%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • MC
    MARY'S CENTER - A FRIENDLY PLACE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • AF
    A FRIENDLY PLACE
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NAPA - RAINBOW HOSUE
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
2
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
5
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
6
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
7
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
8
Saint Michael's College

It is the mission of saint michael's college to contribute through higher education to the enhancement of the human person and to the advancement of human culture in the light of the catholic faith.

Education
9
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
10
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
11
College of St Scholastica Inc

Shaped by the catholic benedictine heritage, the college of st. scholastica provides intellectual and moral preparation for responsible living and meaningful work. in conjunction with this mission statement, the college's vision statement…

Education
12
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Roche University; the most unlike its peers is St Helena Montessori School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCROATIAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $34,000 · OtherCROATIAN SCHOLARSHIP FUNDCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESWIRED: $10,000 · OtherWIREDST MARY'S CENTER - A FRIENDLY PLACE: $8,000 · OtherHANNA BOYS CENTER: $7,500 · Other+21 more: $27,429 · Other+21 moreTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $106,000 · EducationTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICALA ROCHE UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · EducationCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $9,500 · Human ServicesTHE SAN FRANCISCO PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $1,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC: $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentCONNOLLY RANCH EDUCATION CENTER: $4,000 · Food & NutritionSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $400 · Recreation & Sports
Other$156,929Education$111,500Human Services$10,500Youth Development$5,500Food & Nutrition$4,000Recreation & Sports$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $106,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCROATIAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $34,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLA ROCHE UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONNOLLY RANCH EDUCATION CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSt Helena Montessori School Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEarle Baum Center of the Blind Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CROATIAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA ↗
  • Who funds LA ROCHE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNOLLY RANCH EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds St Helena Montessori School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Earle Baum Center of the Blind Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McNabb FoundationDE13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McNabb Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grgich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grgich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Grgich Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Grgich Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grgich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph