Skip to content
Greenpoint Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Greenpoint Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$155k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$116kCommunity Improvement$75kHealth$26kEducation$25kEnvironment$18kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$12kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
City of Decatur Downtown Redevelopment Auhtority$50,000
MATTER$15,970
National Ag in the Classroom$15,000
Second Harvest Food Bank of Middle Tennessee$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
St Romuald School$7,800
Alabama 4H Club Foundation$5,000
Bryn & Harrison Thompson Memorial Foundation Inc$5,000
National FFA Foundation$5,000
Pearl River Community College$5,000
Second Harvest of South Georgia$5,000
Arkansas Foodbank$5,000
MATTER$4,000
Mid-South Community College Foundation Inc$3,500
AgriSafe Network$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Helping Hands of the Delta: $1k → 25%CALLED TO CARE INC: $5k → 17%Hunters for the Hungry: $5k → 19%Bryn & Harrison Thompson Memorial Foundation Inc: $5k → 21%Helping Hands of the Delta: $1k → 25%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IA
IN
NJ
CO
MO
KY
AR
TN
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Greenpoint Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Greenpoint Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 7 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
35

Total granted

$83k
$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

57%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +6%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k
  • MS
    MOREAUVILLE SPORTS CLUB
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k

Funded once

  • CO
    CENTER ON RURAL INNOVATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -19%
  • AW
    AGAPE WORSHIP CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • AI
    Ag in the Classroom
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Farmers Federation

The mission of the alabama farmers federation, a nation's leading farm organization, is to ensure unlimited opportunities for our rural and agricultural community, through active, well-informed members, emphasing education, research,…

—
2
Second Harvest Food Bank of East Tennessee

Second harvest food bank of east tennessee is dedicated to compassionately feeding east tennesseans experiencing hunger & engaging the community in the fight to eliminate hunger.

—
3
Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc

Dedicated to alleviating hunger through acquisition and distribution of food and grocery products, community education to the causes and consequences of hunger, and meaningful action on behalf of people in need of food.

—
4
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
5
Second Harvest Foodbank of North Central Ohio

To grow hope in our region by creating pathways to nutritious food.

Food & Nutrition
6
Ozarks Food Harvest Inc

Ozarks food harvest's mission is to transform hunger into hope.

Food & Nutrition
7
Kentucky Harvest Inc

Kentucky harvest's purpose is to end local hunger by connecting with food donors and engaging volunteers to rescue excess food and move it from those who have it to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
8
Arkansas Farm Bureau Foundation

Arkansas farm bureau foundation (the "foundation") is organized for charitable and educational purposes to further the understanding of agricultural and rural issues, and to support the agricultural and rural community through financial…

Food & Nutrition
9
Heart of Alabama Food Bank Inc

The food bank operates as a clearing house for the collecting, sorting, storing and distribution of edible food to qualified agencies; who in turn pass the food along to alabama's "food insecure" citizens.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank for the Heartland

To eliminate hunger in the heartland by ensuring consistent access to healthy foods through community partnerships.

—
11
Mississippi Food Network Inc

To relieve poverty-related hunger by distributing donated and purchased food and grocery products through a network of member churches and nonprofit organizations; to provide nutrition education to the needy; and to emphasize advocacy and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peinhardts Living History Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
13/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Decatur Downtown Redevelopment Auhtority: $50,000 · OtherCity of Decatur Downtown Redevelopment AuhtorityNational Ag in the Classroom: $15,000 · OtherNational Ag in the ClassroomIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAGAPE WORSHIP CENTER: $11,060 · OtherAGAPE WORSHIP CENTERMOREAUVILLE SPORTS CLUB: $10,000 · OtherPearl River Community College: $10,000 · OtherAg in the Classroom: $9,000 · OtherSt Romuald School: $7,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · Other+23 more: $71,580 · Other+23 moreSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD B…MATTER: $19,970 · Food & NutritionMATTERSECOND HARVEST OF SOUTH GEORGIA INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST OF SOU…ARKANSAS FOODBANK: $5,000 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS FOODBANKTHE FARM AND FOREST FAMILIES OF TENNESSEE INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionCENTER ON RURAL INNOVATION INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementHUNTERS FOR THE HUNGRY: $5,000 · Human ServicesBRYN & HARRISON THOMPSON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesCALLED TO CARE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS OF THE DELTA INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthAGRISAFE NETWORK INC: $4,700 · HealthTHE GRACE PLACE INC: $4,000 · HealthDONOR OUTREACH FOR VETERANS CORP: $2,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $1,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyPersonal Pep Rally Inc: $4,000 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $2,500 · PhilanthropyHUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyNational FFA Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE HATCHIE RIVER: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$206,440Food & Nutrition$67,970Community Improvement$25,000Human Services$17,000Health$16,700Philanthropy$12,500Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF MIDDLE TN INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER ON RURAL INNOVATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL MORGAN COUNTY HFH: $6,080 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF LIMESTONE COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTERS FOR THE HUNGRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE HATCHIE RIVER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN & HARRISON THOMPSON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCALLED TO CARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAGRISAFE NETWORK INC: $4,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPersonal Pep Rally Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetPEINHARDTS LIVING HISTORY FARM: $4,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE GRACE PLACE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FARM AND FOREST FAMILIES OF TENNESSEE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF THE DELTA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetDONOR OUTREACH FOR VETERANS CORP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFLORIDA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Souls Animal League: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …Renaissance Charitabl…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO11.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greenpoint Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greenpoint Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Center On Rural Innovation Inc: 37% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greenpoint’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home