Skip to content
Greenfield Savings Bank Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Greenfield Savings Bank Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2026still arriving
15
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$130kFood & Nutrition$91kHuman Services$62kEnvironment$53kRecreation & Sports$41kCrime & Legal$19kHealth$15kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2026 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $127k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
TAPESTRY HEALTH$15,000
SAFE PASSAGE$12,000
FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MA$10,000
FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS$10,000
LIFE PATH$10,000
STONE SOUP CAFE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
EASTHAMPTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
GROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON$5,000
ARTSPACE$2,500
FRANKLIN LAND TRUST$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
ACADEMY OF MUSIC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LIFE PATH: $10k → 14%LIFEPATH INC: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 9 repeat orgs$306k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$270k
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+9%

Still filing today

67%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
    2× · 2022–2026 · $60k · revenue +31%
  • GE
    GREENFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +29% · 54% of their budget
  • FC
    FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2023–2026 · $25k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • GP
    GREENFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • TH
    THOMAS H SUCHANEK EDUCATIONAL AND ATHLETIC FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -94% · 71% of their budget
  • FC
    Franklin County Agricultural Society Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Federation of Massachusetts Farmers and Gardeners Markets Inc

Mass farmers markets partners wtih farmers, consumers, and communities to improve the health of individuals, strenghten community vitality, and enhance local farm viability through farmers markets.

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Link Inc

Food link is working to create a more equitable food system throughout greater boston by rescuing and distributing high-quality, customized food to under-resourced communities and by advocating for systems change.

Food & Nutrition
3
Franklin Food Pantry Inc

The Franklin Food Pantry offers supplemental food assistance and household necessities to more than 1,800 individuals including nearly 500 children. Clients have access to bread and fresh produce daily during Pantry hours. As a nonprofit…

Human Services
4
Massachusetts Legal Assistance Corp

The massachusetts legal assistance corporation provides leadership and support to improve civil legal services to low-income people in massachusetts through collaboration with the legal services community, the legislature, the public, the…

Crime & Legal
5
Massachusetts Farm Bureau Preservation F oundation Inc

Preservation of agricultural land.

Food & Nutrition
6
Just Roots Inc

Create equitable access to healthy, local food in western Massachusetts

Food & Nutrition
7
Central Ma Food Rescue Inc

Full belly foods purchases food from farms and wholesalers and donates the food to low-income communities across the country.

Food & Nutrition
8
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
9
Community Cooks Inc

Community cooks mobilizes individuals, businesses, civic educational and faith-based groups to prepare home-cooked food for vulnerable populations seeking assistance from human service agencies throughout greater boston. the agency…

Food & Nutrition
10
Massachusetts Nonprofit Network

The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.

Education
11
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
12
Granby Community Access and Media Inc

Granby community access and media, inc. (gcam), located in granby, massachusetts, was established to give the community access to communication resources for the creation and distribution of media. gcam is an independent, non-profit…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Survival Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thomas H Suchanek Educational and Athletic Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREENFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARY: $100,000 · OtherGREENFIELD PUBLIC LIBRARYTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCMT GRACE LAND TRUST: $50,000 · OtherMT GRACE LAND TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS PROGRAM INC: $25,000 · OtherFRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS PROGRAM INCFranklin County Agricultural Society Inc: $25,000 · OtherFranklin County Agricultural Society IncGREENFIELD HIGH SCHOOL- GIRLS SOFTBALL BATTING CAGE: $16,000 · Other+11 more: $58,000 · Other+11 moreGREENFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesGREENFIELD…LIFEPATH INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesLIFEPATH I…SURVIVAL CENTERS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSURVIVAL C…TAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $15,000 · HealthCANCER CONNECTION INC: $15,000 · HealthTHOMAS H SUCHANEK EDUCATIONAL AND ATHLETIC FUND: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsStone Soup Cafe Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalFRANKLIN LAND TRUST INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentMOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST: $2,500 · Environment
Other$444,000Human Services$52,000Health$30,000Recreation & Sports$25,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Crime & Legal$5,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREENFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetFRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS PROGRAM INC: $25,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHOMAS H SUCHANEK EDUCATIONAL AND ATHLETIC FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 71% of budgetFranklin County Agricultural Society Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetLIFEPATH INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER CONNECTION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRESILIENCE CENTER OF FRANKLIN COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSURVIVAL CENTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHILDREN INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCRAIG'S DOORS - A HOME ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …United Way of the Fra…Easthampton Savings B…Community Foundation …Arbella Insurance Fou…AbbVie FoundationNetwork for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · United Way of the Franklin & Hampshire Region · Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Central Ma · Arbella Insurance Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greenfield Savings Bank Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greenfield Savings Bank Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Lifepath Inc: 85% of income from government
  • Friends of Children Inc: 54% of income from government
  • Launchspace Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Survival Centers Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Community Legal Aid Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Franklin County Agricultural Society Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Greenfield Savings Bank Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Greenfield Savings Bank Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greenfield Savings Bank’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home