Skip to content

· Private foundation

Greene Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$483kHealth$405kEducation$399kReligion$333kCommunity Improvement$48kHuman Services$22kRecreation & Sports$20kAnimals$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST COAST CHABAD$35,000
CHABAD OF AMELIA ISLAND AND NASSAU COUNTY INC$30,000
CHABAD OF BLOOMINGTON MN$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $486k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOS INTERNATIONAL: $230k → 8%SOS INTERNATIONAL: $220k → 8%SOS INTERNATIONAL: $33k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 46% of Greene Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 9% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 2%.

Greene Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 10 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
19

Total granted

$1.1M
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-80%
+12%

Still filing today

20%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SOS INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $483k · revenue -80% · 84% of their budget
  • AH
    AMERICAN HEBREW ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $350k · revenue -173%
  • RC
    ROITMAN CHABAD CENTER AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $120k

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH CENTER OF TOWSON & GOUCHER
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • DC
    DUGOUT CLUB OF FERNANDINA BEACH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -41%
  • OE
    OPERATION EMBRACE
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Research Center for Agricultural Sustainability Inc
Philanthropy
2
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
3
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
4
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
5
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
6
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals
7
CSNK2A1 Foundation

Focus on finding a cure for okur-chung neurodevelopmental syndrome and ensuring individuals have the opportunities and support necessary for happy and full lives.

Health
8
Sanibel Sea School Inc

Improve the ocean's future, one person at a time, in order to live in a world where all people value, understand, and care for the ocean.

—
9
The Conservancy of Southwest Florida

We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…

—
10
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
11
Chasin a Dream Foundation Inc

To provide individualized, life changing assistance to families with children battling cancer, cystic fibrosis, and other life threatening illnesses.

Human Services
12
Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc

The clinic for the rehabilitation of wildlife is a teaching hospital and visitor center dedicated to the saving of wildlife through state-of-the-art veterinary care, research, education, and conservation medicine.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sos International Inc; the most unlike its peers is White Oak Conservation Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOS INTERNATIONAL INC: $483,000 · Human ServicesSOS INTERNATIONAL INC+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesROITMAN CHABAD CENTER AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $120,000 · OtherROITMAN CHABAD CENTER AT CORN…JEWISH CENTER OF TOWSON & GOUCHER: $50,000 · OtherJEWISH CENTER OF TOWSON & GOU…CHABAD ACADEMY INC: $45,000 · OtherCHABAD ACADEMY INCBETH SHALOM CONGREGATION INC: $42,000 · OtherBETH SHALOM CONGREGATION INCFIRST COAST CHABAD INC: $35,000 · OtherFIRST COAST CHABAD INCCHABAD OF AMELIA ISLAND & NASSAU COUNTY INC: $30,000 · OtherCHABAD OF AMELIA ISLAND & NAS…Individual grant recipient: $27,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD OF BLOOMINGTON MN: $23,600 · OtherEMET: $20,000 · OtherJACKSONVILLE JEWISH CENTER: $18,944 · OtherOPERATION EMBRACE: $18,105 · Other+8 more: $26,917 · Other+8 moreMAYO CLINIC: $400,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+2 more: $5,300 · HealthAMERICAN HEBREW ACADEMY INC: $350,000 · EducationAMERICAN HEBREW ACADEMY…+1 more: $3,600 · EducationDUGOUT CLUB OF FERNANDINA BEACH INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsPROJECT CHANCE INC: $10,000 · AnimalsWHITE OAK CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Animals+1 more: $250 · AnimalsBARNABAS CENTER INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterAmelia Island Museum of History Inc: $180 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$485,500Other$457,166Health$405,300Education$353,600Recreation & Sports$20,000Animals$11,250Housing & Shelter$1,000Arts & Culture$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOS INTERNATIONAL INC: $483,000 over 3y, 84% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $400,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HEBREW ACADEMY INC: $350,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetDUGOUT CLUB OF FERNANDINA BEACH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetISLAND ART ASSOCIATION INC: $10,439 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPROJECT CHANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKATIE CAPLES FOUNDATION INC: $3,600 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE OAK CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARNABAS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmelia Island Museum of History Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN HEBREW ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds DUGOUT CLUB OF FERNANDINA BEACH INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND ART ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CHANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds KATIE CAPLES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LJD JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE OAK CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Amelia Island Museum of History Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation IncFL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greene Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greene Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Amelia Island Museum of History Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greene Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph