Loading…
· Private foundation
GREENE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$85k
Granted FY2024
3
Grants
2
Communities
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Human Services$486kHealth$405kEducation$354kAnimals$10kHousing & Shelter$1kArts & Culture$180Other$478k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
involvedhealthinternationalmedical
2019
artjewish
2020
jewish
2021
jacksonvillechabadjewish
2022
jacksonvillejewish
2023
chabad
2024
chabad
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
- FIRST COAST CHABAD$35,000
- CHABAD OF AMELIA ISLAND AND NASSAU COUNTY INC$30,000
- CHABAD OF BLOOMINGTON MN$20,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $486k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 22% of GREENE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 9% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 2% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
GREENE FAMILY FOUNDATION INClessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient addressRecipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 11 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
19
Total granted
$1.5M
$138k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
-67%
+47%
Still filing today
27%
47%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SISOS INTERNATIONAL3× · 2017–2020 · $483k · revenue -80% · 84% of their budget
- TMTHE MAYO CLINIC4× · 2018–2021 · $400k · revenue +29%
- AHAMERICAN HEBREW ACADEMY2× · 2017–2018 · $350k · revenue -67%
Funded once
- JCJEWISH CENTER OF TOWSON & GOUCHERone grant, 2021 · $50k
- DCDUGOUT CLUB OF FERNANDINA BEACH FLone grant, 2021 · $20k
- OEOPERATION EMBRACEone grant, 2023 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
The howard hughes medical institute is a philanthropy that serves society through the direct conduct of biomedical research and support for programs in science education.
Health
2
Florida Research Center for
Philanthropy
3
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's
Pediatric healthcare, education & research
—
4
Maimonides Medical Center
Maimonides medical center is dedicated to fostering healthy communities. we provide high quality, compassionate patient care and comprehensive community services. as a premier academic medical center, we are devoted to educating health…
Health
5
Benaroya Research Institute At Virginia
To advance the science that will predict, prevent, reverse, and cure diseases of the immune system.
Health
6
Children's Hospital Ophthalmology
The Foundation provides ophthalmology services primarily to patients at (see Schedule O) Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation also provides care for patients regardless of their ability to pay, as well as…
Health
7
National Jewish Health
National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…
Health
8
The Foundation for Aids Research
Amfar is dedicated to ending the global aids epidemic through innovative research. (see schedule o)
Health
9
New York Academy of Sciences
To advance scientific knowledge and to increase the number of scientifically informed individuals.
—
10
University of Florida
To assist the university of florida in funding of research & development through grants & contractual arrangements & in the commercialization of intellectual properties, which include inventions, discoveries, processes, & work products.
Education
11
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc
To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies. (SEE SCHEDULE O FOR CONTINUATION)
—
12
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Design and conduct world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.
Unclassified
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ljd Jewish Family & and the most unlike its peers is Mayo Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
06the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$485,500Other$478,166Health$405,300Education$353,600Animals$10,250Housing & Shelter$1,000Arts & Culture$180
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ISLAND ART ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT CHANCE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS ↗
- Who funds KATIE CAPLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BARNABAS CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS INN AT NIH ↗
- Who funds DAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds AMELIA ISLAND MUSEUM OF HISTORY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation GREENE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOS INTERNATIONAL.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 274266078 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SOS INTERNATIONAL, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 84% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Greene Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Greene Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines