Skip to content
Green Family Foundaton Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Green Family Foundaton Inc

Its FY2017 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2017
15
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$115k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,500
KOOTENAI HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,500
GOOD SAMARITAN REHABILITATION$1,310
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF KOOTENAI COUNTY$1,000
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM INC$1,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION - KOOTENAI COUNTY$1,000
2ND HARVEST$750
VILLAGE AT ORCHARD RIDGE$500
YOUNG LIFE - NORTH IDAHO$500
OPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CENTER$500
HERITAGE HEALTH$500
LUTHERHAVEN MINISTRIES$425
CHRISTMAS FOR ALL$250
THE NAVIGATORS$100
FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTH IDAHO$100
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRISTMAS FOR ALL: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Third District Guardian Ad Litem Program

Provide guardian ad litem services in child protection cases for the third judicial district of the state of idaho

Crime & Legal
2
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
3
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
4
Building Hope Idaho Inc
Philanthropy
5
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
6
Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc
Health
7
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
8
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
9
Harvest Church Idaho Inc

Providing religious service for adults and youths

Religion
10
Open Arms Pcc and Real Choices

Provide services to people before, throughout, and after an unplanned pregnancy.

Health
11
Catholic Charities of Idaho

Catholic charities of idaho strengthens families and individuals and engages the community to break the cycle of poverty.

—
12
Brave Hearts Idaho
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of North Idaho Inc; the most unlike its peers is Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOOTENAI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherKOOTENAI HEALTH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNION GOSPEL MISSION - KOOTENAI COUNTY: $1,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION - KOOTENAI COUNTYVILLAGE AT ORCHARD RIDGE: $500 · OtherVILLAGE AT ORCHARD RIDGEDIRNE HEALTH CENTERS INC: $500 · OtherDIRNE HEALTH CENTERS INCOPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CENTER: $500 · OtherOPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CENTERYOUNG LIFE - NORTH IDAHO: $500 · OtherYOUNG LIFE - NORTH IDAHO+1 more: $100 · OtherGood Samaritan Rehabilitation Inc: $1,310 · HealthGood Samari…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF KOOTENAI COUNTY IDAHO INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $750 · Food & NutritionLUTHERHAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $425 · Recreation & SportsCHRISTMAS FOR ALL: $250 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $100 · Housing & Shelter
Other$8,100Health$1,310Youth Development$1,000Civil Rights$1,000Food & Nutrition$750Recreation & Sports$425Human Services$250Housing & Shelter$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGood Samaritan Rehabilitation Inc: $1,310 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF KOOTENAI COUNTY IDAHO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRNE HEALTH CENTERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERHAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $425 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationIdaho Community Found…The Avista FoundationFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Innovia FoundationWA19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Avista Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Green Family Foundaton Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Green Family Foundaton Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Green Family Foundaton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home