Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Idaho · Nonprofit

CHRISTMAS FOR ALL

CHRISTMAS FOR ALL (Idaho) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $69,154 to it, the largest being COEUR D'ALENE ELKS LODGE NUMBER 1254 ($15,488). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$210k
Revenue FY2026
9
Funders on record
$69k
Grants received
$99k
Net assets
4/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%

Against its field

CHRISTMAS FOR ALL is better cushioned than half of the 68 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin2% · below the median
Months of reserve5.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−7% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 68 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2026

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($304k) Expenses 100 ($215k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2022 Revenue 81 ($246k) Expenses 58 ($125k) Net assets 215 ($226k)2023 Revenue 66 ($202k) Expenses 105 ($225k) Net assets 193 ($203k)2024 Revenue 59 ($180k) Expenses 105 ($225k) Net assets 150 ($158k)2025 Revenue 53 ($161k) Expenses 105 ($225k) Net assets 89 ($94k)2026 Revenue 69 ($210k) Expenses 95 ($205k) Net assets 94 ($99k)
202120222023202420252026
Revenue (69)Expenses (95)Net assets (94)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of CHRISTMAS FOR ALL’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,813 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$89k
21
$121k
22
$23k
23
$45k
24
$64k
25
$5k
26
5.8
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $2k → $17k.

4 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)38% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CHRISTMAS FOR ALL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CHRISTMAS FOR ALL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

60% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CHRISTMAS FOR ALL.

22%
largest funder
58%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 89% · 2018 60% · 2019 62% · 2020 50% · 2021 56% · 2022 68% · 2023 47%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of CHRISTMAS FOR ALL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

61% of CHRISTMAS FOR ALL's grant income comes from Idaho funders.

WA
ID
OH

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Idaho out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $26k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CHRISTMAS FOR ALL

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Idaho

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

2
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHRISTMAS FOR ALL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CHRISTMAS FOR ALL?
CHRISTMAS FOR ALL (Idaho) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $69,154 to it, the largest being COEUR D'ALENE ELKS LODGE NUMBER 1254 ($15,488). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CHRISTMAS FOR ALL have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $69,154 in grants to CHRISTMAS FOR ALL, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CHRISTMAS FOR ALL?
COEUR D'ALENE ELKS LODGE NUMBER 1254 is the largest funder on record, with $15,488 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CHRISTMAS FOR ALL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Idaho. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2021–2026), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing