Skip to content

· Public charity

GreatLife Cares Foundation

The Focus of GreatLife Cares Foundation is:To enrich the lives of families and individuals through golf, fitness and healthy lifestyles.To Help develop values, character and leadership qualities in mentoring relationships through involvement in golf, fitness and athletics.To provide programs and education on golf, fitness, nutrition and…

$184k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$125kYouth Development$73kHuman Services$62kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kPhilanthropy$32kInternational$30kFood & Nutrition$27kReligion$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $139,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $184,450 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,450 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$187k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TeamMates of Sioux Falls$50,000
Fellowship of Christian Athle$11,500
Soux Empire United Way$11,000
Junior Achievement$11,000
Furniture Mission$9,500
YMCA$7,500
Volunteer of America$5,500
SF Hope Coalition$5,500
Feeding South Dakota$5,500
Boys and Girls Club$5,500
Bishop OGorman Catholic Scho$5,500
St Francis House$5,500
Young Life$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Dakotabilities: $6k → 9%Dakotabilities: $6k → 9%Center of Hope: $12k → 9%Furniture Mission: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201k · 9 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +110% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$201k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
+44%

Still filing today

44%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    SIOUX EMPIRE UNITED WAY INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue +2%
  • SF
    SIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM
    2× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +192%
  • DI
    DAKOTABILITIES INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $12k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • TK
    THE KANSAS CITY ROYALS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +44%
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +18%
  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +129%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Downtown Sioux Falls

Downtown Sioux Falls boldly leads the downtown community by championing diverse experiences, economic growth, and a healthy environment.

—
2
South Dakota Retailers Association

Representing the interest of retail businesses who sell retail products and services throughout the state of south dakota.

—
3
South Dakota Voices for Peace

Sd voices for peace provides five programming areas to assist vulnerable communities access services throughout the state: legal services, multilingual outreach, training and education, advocacy and civic engagement and rapid response.

—
4
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
5
Sioux City Housing Trust Fund Inc

To act as the local governing board of sioux city housing trust fund by collecting and disbursing revenue for the purpose of encouraging the development and redevelopment of affordable housing for sioux city's income qualified residents.

Housing & Shelter
6
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
7
Western South Dakota Senior Services Inc

To assist seniors in maintaining optimal health, independence, and socialization, deferring admission to long term care facilities and improving their quality of life.

—
8
Bike Share Kc

Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.

Human Services
9
Siouxland Habitat for Humanity

To provide affordable housing for low-income families

—
10
South Dakota Rural Electric Association

To serve the rural electric cooperatives in south dakota, to promote the effective development of rural electrification in south dakota on a cooperative, non-profit basis.

—
11
St Cloud Downtown Alliance Foundation

Enhancing and strengthening our community and our regional core.

—
12
Realtor Association of the Sioux Empire Inc

To offer leadership, involvement and support; encouraging the membership to professionally achieve their goals and serve all in the spirit of the golden rule.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding South Dakota; the most unlike its peers is Center of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TeamMates of Sioux Falls: $50,000 · OtherTeamMates of Sioux FallsJunior Achievement: $43,250 · OtherJunior AchievementSIOUX EMPIRE UNITED WAY INC: $32,000 · OtherSIOUX EMPIRE UNITED WAY INCSioux Falls Teammates Mentori: $25,000 · OtherSioux Falls Teammates MentoriCollsion: $23,200 · OtherCollsionYMCA: $19,200 · OtherYMCAFellowship of Christian Athle: $17,500 · OtherFellowship of Christian AthleBoys and Girls Club: $14,700 · OtherOGorman High School: $12,250 · OtherStep up for Heroes: $10,000 · OtherHelpline: $9,500 · Other+5 more: $27,500 · Other+5 moreTEAM RUBICON INC: $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTEAM RUBICON I…ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterALL HANDS AND …THE KANSAS CITY ROYALS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KANSAS …CENTER OF HOPE: $12,250 · Human ServicesDAKOTABILITIES INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesFURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $9,500 · Human ServicesSIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM: $20,000 · AnimalsFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA: $19,450 · Food & NutritionSTOCKYARDS PLAZA INC: $7,875 · Arts & Culture
Other$284,100Public Safety & Disaster$60,000Philanthropy$50,000Human Services$33,750Animals$20,000Food & Nutrition$19,450Arts & Culture$7,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE KANSAS CITY ROYALS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSIOUX EMPIRE UNITED WAY INC: $32,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA: $19,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE: $12,250 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetDAKOTABILITIES INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $9,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSTOCKYARDS PLAZA INC: $7,875 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE KANSAS CITY ROYALS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX EMPIRE UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds DAKOTABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds STOCKYARDS PLAZA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOUSE OF SIOUX FALLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation IncSD19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · Midcontinent Foundation · Levo Cares Foundation · Avera Health · South Dakota Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Tenfold Foundation Inc · Sheldon F Reese Foundation · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Sanford Group Return · The Graco Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization GreatLife Cares Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from GreatLife Cares Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to GreatLife Cares Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to GreatLife Cares Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on GreatLife Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph