Skip to content

· Public charity

Greater Philadelphia Community Alliance

Gpca's mission is to break the cycle of generational proverty by ensuring equitable distribution of the resources for vulnerable children, families, and communities.

$533k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$951kCrime & Legal$623kEducation$317kHousing & Shelter$113kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $282,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $533,488 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $250,988 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMPAIGN FOR WORKING FAMILIES$175,000
SEAMAAC$75,000
SOUL FOOD CDC$32,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $419k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMBODIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $89k → 22%SEAMAAC: $156k → 22%SEAMAAC: $100k → 22%SEAMAAC: $75k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 4 repeat orgs$757k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$1.3M
$757k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’24’25
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Campaign for Working Families Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $497k · revenue +46%
  • SA
    SOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $330k · revenue -3%
  • BD
    BENEFITS DATA TRUST
    2× · 2022–2024 · $317k · revenue -87%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITIES SOUTHEAST PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2022 · $532k · revenue 0%
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $93k · revenue +18%
  • CA
    CAMBODIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $89k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Justice Project

To provide high quality civil legal assistance and other services to indigent individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
2
Consumer Bankruptcy Assistance Project

Assist philadelphians whose incomes are below the federal poverty level and seek to stabilize their finances. we recruit, train and support volunteer attorneys who represent clients with either debt counseling and/or chapter 7 bankruptcy…

Unclassified
3
Philadelphia Legal Assistance Center Inc C/O the Organization

Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families by providing accessible, creative, and high quality legal assistance and working collaboratively for systemic change.

Crime & Legal
4
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment
5
The Public Interest Law Center

The Public Interest Law Center uses high-impact legal strategies to advance the civil, social, and economic rights of communities in the Philadelphia region facing discrimination, inequality, and poverty. We use litigation, community…

Crime & Legal
6
Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corporation

The corporation's mission includes, but is not limited to, combatingcommunity deterioration within chinatown; preserving and developingthe chinatown community; leading the community in neighborhoodplanning, considering land use, and…

Community Improvement
7
Community Legal Services of Mid-Florida Inc

Provides no-cost legal services to the most vulnerable in central florida, helping them protect their families, health, and livelihood.

—
8
Defender Association of Philadelphia

2

Crime & Legal
9
Philadelphia Council for Community Advancement

Pcca's mission is to strengthen households and communities by developing and preserving homeownership and affordable housing, and educating consumers to increase accessability to economic opportunities.

—
10
Central Philadelphia Development Corporation C/O Center City District

To strengthen the competitiveness of center city philadelphia as an attractive place to work, to visit, and to live to enhance center city as the vibrant hub of the greater philadelphia region through research, planning, advocacy, and…

Arts & Culture
11
Summit Legal Aid

Civil justice for those in need, their homes secured, families protected, and finances fortified.

Crime & Legal
12
Community Legal Services

Community Legal Services was established to ensure the best interests of the public are represented by participating and intervening before the California Public Utilities Commission, and all other municipal, state, or federal regulatory…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Legal Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Benefits Data Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Campaign for Working Families Inc: $497,100 · Crime & LegalCampaign for Working Families IncCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES: $92,500 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICESCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $33,300 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INCUNITED COMMUNITIES SOUTHEAST PHILADELPHIA: $531,850 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITIES SOUTHEAST P…+1 more: $10,000 · OtherSOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC: $330,125 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL …CAMBODIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC: $89,341 · Human ServicesCAMBODIAN ASSOCIATION O…BENEFITS DATA TRUST: $317,132 · EducationBENEFITS DATA TRU…Soul Food Community Development Corporation Inc: $112,778 · Housing & Shelter
Crime & Legal$622,900Other$541,850Human Services$419,466Education$317,132Housing & Shelter$112,778

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED COMMUNITIES SOUTHEAST PHILADELPHIA: $531,850 over 1y, 21% of budgetCampaign for Working Families Inc: $497,100 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetSOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC: $330,125 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetBENEFITS DATA TRUST: $317,132 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSoul Food Community Development Corporation Inc: $112,778 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES: $92,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCAMBODIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC: $89,341 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $33,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn FoundationPA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Poverty Action Fund · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Philadelphia Community Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Philadelphia Community Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Philadelphia Community Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph