· Public charity
Greater New Orleans Development Foundation
To foster regional economic development and create quality jobs within the metropolitan new orleans area.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of GREATER NEW ORLEANS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $64k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPPORTUNITY HUB | $771,257 |
| BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER | $400,877 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE | $209,388 |
| GREEN LIGHT NEW ORLEANS | $185,138 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS | $184,054 |
| ONE ACADIANA INC | $183,188 |
| LOUISIANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC | $172,380 |
| NICHOLLS STATE UNIVERSITY | $133,724 |
| SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AND A&M COLLEGE | $129,814 |
| SOUTH LOUISIANA ECONOMIC COUNCIL INC | $111,695 |
| ENTERGY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY | $94,151 |
| SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AT NEW ORLEANS | $52,675 |
| SOUTHWEST LA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE | $39,065 |
| LOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $259k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OFOHUB FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +359% · 100% of their budget
- BRBATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER3× · 2022–2024 · $623k · revenue +4%
- OAONE ACADIANA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $209k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- OEOXBOW EDUCATION PBCone grant, 2020 · $104k
- COCITY OF NEW ORLEANS - NOPDone grant, 2023 · $69k
- NONEW ORLEANS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue -83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Central Louisiana Chamber of Commerce is: to promote economic growth for central Louisiana and its citizens; to serve as a business advocate for our members; and to foster a business climate that supports business and…
Economic development activities for north louisiana. the north louisiana economic partnership works to ensure that companies identify north louisiana as a desirable business location and encourages capital investment and job creation by…
To develop and connect leaders and citizens to drive transformative change for a better louisiana. through its work, the organization seeks to transform louisiana into a dynamic, future-ready economy that offers every citizen and business…
Attract new business to southwest louisiana.
To provide sound analysis of state fiscal issues to promote economic prosperity, a rising standard of living, and the opportunity for all citizens to reach their highest potential.
To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.
Infrastructure Solutions
Lede New Orleans is a community media hub that trains emerging Black and Brown storytellers,produces community-centered journalism, and creates trusted spaces for civic dialogue.Founded in 2020, Lede works to advance information equity in…
To foster regional economic development and create quality jobs within the metropolitan new orleans area.
To train and coach existing and inspirin
To build, promote and support the orleans business community
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nola Business Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Entergy Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OHUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS REGIONAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ONE ACADIANA INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN LIGHT NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds SOUTH LOUISIANA ECONOMIC COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds Entergy Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA PAROLE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHAMBER SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NOLA BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds CORPORATE INTERNSHIP LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds Lower Ninth Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Foundation for Louisiana · The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Keep Louisiana Beautiful Foundationinc · New Orleans Community Support Foundation · Ochsner Clinic Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · The Kresge Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater New Orleans Development Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.