Skip to content
Greater Longview United Way Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Greater Longview United Way Inc

The greater longview united way disburses funds to health and human service agencies in the greater longview area.

$788k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$167k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$1.5MHealth$746kYouth Development$547kHousing & Shelter$343kCrime & Legal$299kEducation$178kFood & Nutrition$153kPublic Safety & Disaster$112kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $393k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $395k
$25,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LONGVIEW COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INFORMATION AND SERVICE CENTER INC$166,900
EAST TEXAS COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE$102,750
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREGG COUNTY$70,000
SEESAW INC DBA SEESAW CHILDRENS PLACE$55,000
EAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC$45,000
EAST TEXAS LITERACY COUNCIL$42,800
WOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC$40,000
FRIENDS OF PARTNERS IN PREVENTION$36,750
NORTHEAST TX HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$33,900
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCIL$25,500
THE MARTIN HOUSE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER$25,000
PARENTING RESOURCE CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$24,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS$22,500
SALVATION ARMY$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $529k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SEE SAW CHILDREN'S CENTER: $60k → 16%SEE SAW CHILDREN'S CENTER: $60k → 16%SEE SAW CHILDRENS PLACE: $55k → 16%SEESAW INC DBA SEESAW CHILDRENS PLACE: $55k → 16%SEE SAW CHILDRENS CENTER: $54k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS SERVING E: $21k → 16%LONGVIEW CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $47k → 16%LONGVIEW CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $40k → 16%LONGVIEW CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $38k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF LONGVIEW: $23k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF LONGVIEW: $23k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF LONGVIEW: $21k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF LONGVIEW: $20k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF LONGVIEW INC: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 20 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$3.7M
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+82%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LONGVIEW COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $715k · revenue +155%
  • SI
    SEESAW INC DBA SEESAW CHILDREN'S PLACE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $284k · revenue +54%
  • NT
    NORTHEAST TEXAS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $218k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • DO
    D O R S COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $54k · revenue +82%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of the Big Pines
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
2
Northeast Texas Child Advocacy Center Inc

To bring hope and healing while working together to break the cycle of child abuse.

Human Services
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
4
Community Family Centers Inc

To equip families with the tools they need to become self-sufficent members of the community.

Human Services
5
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
6
Youth and Family Alliance

Youth and family alliance (dba lifeworks) is a fearless advocate for youth and young adults pursuing a life they love and a stable future for themselves and their families. we strive to break cycles of instability by providing support and…

Human Services
7
Homeless Outreach Mitigation and Emergency Center

to reach functional zero homelessness in Hays County through outreach case management direct aid and emergency response while maintaining the dignity of the people we serve

Human Services
8
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
9
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
10
Communities in Schools of East Texas

Dropout prevention program providing services which will enhance the likelihood of students continued participation in their education process.

Education
11
Lena Pope Home Inc

The mission of lena pope home, inc. (lena pope) is to equip children, families, caregivers, and community with a strong foundation through counseling, education and behavior interventions.

Human Services
12
The Lullaby House

The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Texas Child Advocates Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of the Big Pines. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LONGVIEW COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $715,037 · Human ServicesLONGVIEW COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INCSEESAW INC DBA SEESAW CHILDREN'S PLACE: $284,240 · Human ServicesSEESAW INC DBA SEESAW CHILDREN'S PLACEWOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC: $184,319 · Human ServicesWOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INCLONGVIEW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $177,558 · Human ServicesLONGVIEW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERPARENTING RESOURCE CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC: $113,810 · Human ServicesPARENTING RESOURCE CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $111,788 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Cha…FAMILY PROMISE OF LONGVIEW INC: $97,997 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF LONGVIEW INCNORTHEAST TEXAS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $217,955 · OtherNORTHEAST TEXAS HABITAT FOR HUMAN…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREGG COUNTY: $199,404 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREGG COUN…EAST TEXAS LITERACY COUNCIL: $178,100 · OtherEAST TEXAS LITERACY COUNCILBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCIL: $153,359 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS …FRIENDS OF PARTNERS PREVENT: $128,824 · OtherFRIENDS OF PARTNERS PREVENTTHE SALVATION ARMY: $108,852 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSABINE VALLEY REGIONAL MHMR CENTER: $58,469 · OtherD O R S COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $54,205 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of the Big Pines: $40,094 · OtherEAST TEXAS COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM & DRUG ABUSE: $465,906 · HealthEAST TEXAS COUNCIL…TWELVE-WAY FOUNDATION INC: $87,250 · HealthTWELVE-WAY FOUNDAT…PATHSTONES COUNSELING CENTER: $64,500 · HealthPATHSTONES COUNSEL…EAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC: $196,166 · Civil RightsMARTIN HOUSE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $102,600 · Crime & LegalGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $100,359 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF PARTNERS IN PREVENTION: $36,750 · Community Improvement
Human Services$1,684,749Other$1,139,262Health$617,656Civil Rights$196,166Crime & Legal$102,600Youth Development$100,359Community Improvement$36,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLONGVIEW COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $715,037 over 5y, 16% of budgetEAST TEXAS COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM & DRUG ABUSE: $465,906 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetSEESAW INC DBA SEESAW CHILDREN'S PLACE: $284,240 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetNORTHEAST TEXAS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $217,955 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetEAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC: $196,166 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetWOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC: $184,319 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetEAST TEXAS LITERACY COUNCIL: $178,100 over 5y, 14% of budgetLONGVIEW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $177,558 over 4y, 15% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCIL: $153,359 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetPARENTING RESOURCE CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC: $113,810 over 5y, 34% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $111,788 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIN HOUSE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $102,600 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $100,359 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LONGVIEW INC: $97,997 over 5y, 17% of budgetTWELVE-WAY FOUNDATION INC: $87,250 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetPATHSTONES COUNSELING CENTER: $64,500 over 5y, 22% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of the Big Pines: $40,094 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF PARTNERS IN PREVENTION: $36,750 over 1y, 25% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communitie…Rosa May Griffin Foun…Ben and Maytee Fisch …The Crain FoundationChristus HealthLongview Greggton Rot…Wece B and Martha a J…Eastman FoundationAmerican Electric Pow…Enterprise Holdings F…Amazonsmile Foundation
East Texas Communities FoundationTX23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · Rosa May Griffin Foundation · Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · The Crain Foundation · Christus Health · Longview Greggton Rotary Charities Inc · Wece B and Martha a Johnson Foundation · Eastman Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Longview United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Longview United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Longview United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home