· Public charity
Greater Longview United Way Inc
The greater longview united way disburses funds to health and human service agencies in the greater longview area.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k15 grants · $393k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $395k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LONGVIEW COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INFORMATION AND SERVICE CENTER INC | $166,900 |
| EAST TEXAS COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG ABUSE | $102,750 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREGG COUNTY | $70,000 |
| SEESAW INC DBA SEESAW CHILDRENS PLACE | $55,000 |
| EAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC | $45,000 |
| EAST TEXAS LITERACY COUNCIL | $42,800 |
| WOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC | $40,000 |
| FRIENDS OF PARTNERS IN PREVENTION | $36,750 |
| NORTHEAST TX HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC | $33,900 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCIL | $25,500 |
| PARENTING RESOURCE CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC | $25,000 |
| THE MARTIN HOUSE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $24,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS | $22,500 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $17,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $529k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLONGVIEW COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $715k · revenue +155%
- SISEESAW INC DBA SEESAW CHILDREN'S PLACE5× · 2020–2024 · $284k · revenue +54%
- NTNORTHEAST TEXAS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $218k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- DOD O R S COMMUNITY SERVICES INCone grant, 2020 · $54k · revenue +82%
- BABoys and Girls Club of the Big Pinesone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To bring hope and healing while working together to break the cycle of child abuse.
To provide shelter to abused families.
To equip families with the tools they need to become self-sufficent members of the community.
to reach functional zero homelessness in Hays County through outreach case management direct aid and emergency response while maintaining the dignity of the people we serve
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
Youth and family alliance (dba lifeworks) is a fearless advocate for youth and young adults pursuing a life they love and a stable future for themselves and their families. we strive to break cycles of instability by providing support and…
Dropout prevention program providing services which will enhance the likelihood of students continued participation in their education process.
The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
The mission of lena pope home, inc. (lena pope) is to equip children, families, caregivers, and community with a strong foundation through counseling, education and behavior interventions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Texas Child Advocates Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of the Big Pines. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LONGVIEW COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM & DRUG ABUSE ↗
- Who funds SEESAW INC DBA SEESAW CHILDREN'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds WOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds LONGVIEW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA EAST TEXAS AREA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds PARENTING RESOURCE CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MARTIN HOUSE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LONGVIEW INC ↗
- Who funds TWELVE-WAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PATHSTONES COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds D O R S COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of the Big Pines ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PARTNERS IN PREVENTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · Rosa May Griffin Foundation · Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · The Crain Foundation · Christus Health · Longview Greggton Rotary Charities Inc · Wece B and Martha a Johnson Foundation · Eastman Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Longview United Way Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.