· Public charity
Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers
Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers association forges key partnerships with community based organizations to support educational programs and connect with residents and promote more
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 40 grants below total $954,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,006,944 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $52,444 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $541k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $381k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ohio Justice & Policy Cent | $103,000 |
| The TAP Foundation | $101,000 |
| Ohio Organizing Collaborat | $75,000 |
| ACLU | $52,000 |
| Policy Matters Ohio | $50,000 |
| Peace Development Fund | $30,000 |
| Ohio Voice | $28,500 |
| Gr Cleveland Congregations | $22,500 |
| Ohio Families United Again | $22,000 |
| Vincentian Ohio Action Net | $20,000 |
| Heartbeat Movement | $20,000 |
| Freedom ROC | $20,000 |
| Ohioans to Stop Executions | $20,000 |
| Healing Broken Circles | $20,000 |
| The Bail Project | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $527k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OJOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER3× · 2022–2024 · $209k · revenue +79%
- OVOHIO VOICE2× · 2023–2024 · $139k · revenue +31%
- TOTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE2× · 2023–2024 · $83k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- SUSHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +252%
- TLThe Land Cleone grant, 2022 · $17k · revenue -36%
- YYG2Dgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue +142%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To work as a coalition of labor unions, community organzation, and religious community to raise the public awarness of and build campaigns to promote workers rights an social justice issues.
The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.
Local ballot issue committee
The mission of Ohio Crime Victim Justice Center (OCVJC) is to ensure that the constitutional and statutory rights of Ohio crime victims are protected and enforced in state and federal jurisdictions in all 88 Ohio counties. To fulfill this…
Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…
To convene a high capacity group of donors that strategically leverage resources to achieve political and policy goals advancing the progressive movement in Ohio by strengthening infrastructure.
Research organization focuses on eliminating and preventing gerrymandering in the State of Ohio.
At lead ohio our goal is to make a difference in communities across ohio by recruiting, training, supporting and empowering progressive leaders in all regions of the state.
To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.
The ohio alliance for civil justice is a not-for-profit broad-based coalition which works to reform ohio's civil justice system.
The league of women voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ohio Organizing Collaborative and the most unlike its peers is Smart Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds OHIO VOICE ↗
- Who funds TAP Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds POLICY MATTERS OHIO ↗
- Who funds OHIOANS TO STOP EXECUTIONS ↗
- Who funds Fair Elections Center ↗
- Who funds Peace Development Fund ↗
- Who funds PROMISE OF DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds MIDTOWN CLEVELAND INC ↗
- Who funds Young Latino Network ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS-OH ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND CONGREGATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO FAMILIES UNITE AGAINST POLICE BRUTALITY ↗
- Who funds HEALING BROKEN CIRCLES INC ↗
- Who funds VINCENTIAN OHIO ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WRITERS IN RESIDENCE ↗
- Who funds JUVENILE JUSTICE COALITION ↗
- Who funds ORIANA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO VOTER ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds HARM REDUCTION OHIO ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM RIGHTEOUS ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds TOWARDS EMPLOYMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Renounce Denounce Gang Intervention Program Corporation ↗
- Who funds SHOWING UP FOR RACIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds The Land Cle ↗
- Who funds ALPHA OMEGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DEATH PENALTY ACTION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND DELTA FOUNDATION LIFE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SMART DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds M-PAC CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Ohio Voice · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Center for Community Solutions · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio · New Venture Fund · The Nord Family Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Pinnacle Gardens Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers?
Find your warmest path to Greater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.