Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce

To improve the business, social and civic environment of the greater boston area and to become the leading representative in the boston area in the consideration of local, state and national issues.

$112k
Granted FY2019
9
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

89% of Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Boston Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $85k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
8
’18
9
’19
2
’20
1
’21
2
’22
2
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$278kArts & Culture$130kEmployment$100kRecreation & Sports$75kHealth$40kCommunity Improvement$40kYouth Development$25kEducation$25kOther$0
02FY2019 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $85,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $111,748 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,748 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOLAR ATHLETES$25,000
THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$25,000
BLACK ECONOMIC COUNCIL OF MASSACHUSETTS$5,000
THE LATINA CIRCLE INC$5,000
COMMUNITY SERVINGS$5,000
ABEKAM INC$5,000
THE DIMOCK CENTER$5,000
HEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC$5,000
NAACP (NEW ENGLAND CIVIL RIGHTS FUND)$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Community Servings: $5k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $5k → 16%Community Servings: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$210k · 5 repeat orgs$312k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +127% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$210k
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+127%
+32%

Still filing today

40%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BOSTON WHILE BLACK
    4× · 2020–2023 · $100k
  • SA
    SCHOLAR ATHLETES INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue -91%
  • COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • MR
    MBTA Recruitment and Retention Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • JF
    JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -37%
  • CH
    CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +229%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Impact Initiative Fund

Form 990 - organization's mission or most significant activitiesboston impact initiative (bii) is a nonprofit impact investment fund and certified community development financial institution (cdfi). bii provides small businesses,…

Community Improvement
2
Massachusetts Competitive Partnership Inc

Macp's stated mission is to promote job stabilization and growth across the full spectrum of business, and within all geographic regions of the commonwealth through working in partnership with business and government. macp's main priority…

Human Services
3
New England Community Project Inc

Necp believes that social change happens when those most impacted by issues of systemic injustice, organize at the block level to address issues within their neighborhoods. through their involvement at a community level, residents engage…

Community Improvement
4
Browning the Green Space Inc

We seek to facilitate a just energy transition by putting black and brown communities first, and enabling systems change at the intersection of social, environmental, and economic justice. we are powering a just energy transition in the…

Environment
5
Business Executives for National Security

Bens applies industry experience and best business practices to help address our nation's pressing national security challenges.

International
6
Massachusetts Business Roundtable Inc

The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…

—
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
9
Greater Boston Council On Alcoholism Inc
Philanthropy
10
Massachusetts E-Health Collaborative
—
11
Massachusetts Public Health Association

Mpha promotes a healthy massachusetts through advocacy, education, community organizing and coalition building. we are leaders in the movement to create health equity by addressing the root causes of health and wellness. we promote…

Health
12
Boston Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Care for All Inc and the most unlike its peers is Freedom for All Massachusetts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%5%<5yr13%5%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr22%30%20–35yr14%20%35–55yr15%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr13%1%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr22%68%20–35yr14%8%35–55yr15%9%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/32
the rest of the field
10%
696/6,681

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MBTA Recruitment and Retention Fund — $100,000 · OtherMBTA Recruitment and Retention FundBOSTON WHILE BLACK — $100,000 · OtherBOSTON WHILE BLACKSCHOLAR ATHLETES INC — $75,000 · OtherSCHOLAR ATHLETES INCMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $25,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDTHE COMMITTEE TO PRESERVE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS FOR K-12 STUDENTS — $25,000 · OtherTHE COMMITTEE TO PRESERVE EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS FOR K-12 STUD…THE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) — $15,000 · Other+14 more — $89,900 · Other+14 moreBoston Foundation Inc — $250,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation IncDIMOCK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $7,500 · PhilanthropyJOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $25,000 · EducationCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLK CHIP INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE PARTNERSHIP INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $5,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $5,000 · Health
Other$429,900Philanthropy$277,500Education$25,000Youth Development$20,000Human Services$15,000Arts & Culture$10,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoston Foundation Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOLAR ATHLETES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS WORKING CAPITAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIMOCK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND CIVIL RIGHTS FUND INC — $10,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE DIRECTORS NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWE ARE ALX INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBLK CHIP INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetINITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRon Burton Training Village Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOR ALL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM FOR ALL MASSACHUSETTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TRUST INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncEastern Bank Foundati…Cummings Foundation G…Mass General Brigham …Nellie Mae Education …Combined Jewish Phila…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Boston Foundation IncMA23.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return · Nellie Mae Education Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Compass Working Capital Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home