Skip to content
Great Pacific Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Great Pacific Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$14MPublic Benefit$7.0MReligion$4.0MAnimals$1.5MHealth$889kEducation$200kRecreation & Sports$100kPhilanthropy$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.5M
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Jerusalem Foundation$1,781,308
United Isreal Appeal of Canada$721,959
Save Mart Cares Foundation$100,000
Calvary Assembly$50,000
Grace City Church of Boston$25,000
Adventures of the Heart Ministries$15,000
Jh Israel$15,000
Doulos Partners$10,000
Israel Team Advocates International Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Adventures of the Heart Ministries: $15k → 9%Adventures of the Heart Ministries: $15k → 9%Adventures of the Heart Ministries: $15k → 9%Adventures of the Heart Ministries: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
NJ
CA
MO
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 11 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
23

Total granted

$17M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+45%

Still filing today

64%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $6.3M · revenue +37%
  • JI
    JH ISRAEL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +13%
  • CH
    CHEERFUL HEART MISSION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $84k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • YP
    YouVersion Project
    one grant, 2024 · $4.5M
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH RENAISSANCE I
    one grant, 2024 · $2.5M · revenue 0% · 75% of their budget
  • GR
    GHANA RURAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.4M · revenue -97% · 97% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Israel Restoration Ministries
Religion
2
The Jerusalem Connection
—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Why Stand With Israel

To educate and inspire the global church to live out its biblical responsibility to stand with israel.

Religion
5
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
6
Israel Initiative 2020 Inc
International
7
American Friends of Judea and Samaria Inc

Mission: american friends of judea and samaria (afjs) is a non-profit educational organization 501(c)3 dedicated to increasing knowledge, and sharing the truth about the israeli communities of judea, samaria, and the jordan valley to the…

Education
8
Partners Charity Fund for Israel

To support charitable organization and programs providing food, clothing and financial aid to indigent individuals and families in financial distress.

Philanthropy
9
Jehoyah Jireh Usa
International
10
Global Jewry Ltd

To connect and strengthen the global jewish community by bridging internal divides and addressing external challenges. we use social media and offer a number of "signature programs" to achieve our goals.

Religion
11
Behold Israel

To provide accurate reporting on israel and current events based on god's written word and most importantly lead people to the saving knowledge of jesus christ.

Religion
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cheerful Heart Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

One For Israel: $9,000,000 · OtherOne For IsraelYouVersion Project: $4,500,000 · OtherYouVersion ProjectUnited Isreal Appeal of Canada: $721,959 · Other+18 more: $2,743,593 · Other+18 moreTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $6,332,667 · EducationTHE RONALD REAGAN PRES…+1 more: $100,000 · EducationJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC: $1,781,308 · InternationalJERUSALEM FOUN…GHANA RURAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,350,000 · InternationalGHANA RURAL IN…AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $500,000 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR …ONE FAMILY FUND: $250,000 · InternationalONE FAMILY FUN…+4 more: $255,000 · International+4 moreFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH RENAISSANCE I: $2,500,000 · ReligionFOUNDATION FO…JH ISRAEL: $1,090,000 · ReligionJH ISRAELAlpha USA: $317,500 · ReligionAlpha USA+2 more: $60,000 · ReligionOREGON COAST AQUARIUM INC: $1,000,000 · AnimalsSAVE MART CARES: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $95,000 · Philanthropy
Other$16,965,552Education$6,432,667International$4,136,308Religion$3,967,500Animals$1,000,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Philanthropy$95,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $6,332,667 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH RENAISSANCE I: $2,500,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetGHANA RURAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,350,000 over 1y, 97% of budgetJH ISRAEL: $1,090,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetOREGON COAST AQUARIUM INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $500,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAlpha USA: $317,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetONE FAMILY FUND: $250,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetISRAEL AIRFORCE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $95,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHEERFUL HEART MISSION INC: $83,640 over 2y, 19% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADVENTURES OF THE HEART MINISTRIES INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetJEWISH RENAISSANCE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDOULOS PARTNERS: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetISRAEL TEAM ADVOCATES INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetA ROCHA USA INC A ROCHA USA: $36,800 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetVISION ORLANDO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Great Pacific Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Great Pacific Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • Jewish Renaissance Foundation Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Oregon Coast Aquarium Inc: 24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Great Pacific Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Great Pacific Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Great Pacific’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home