Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grant Thornton Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.2MCivil Rights$300kPublic Safety & Disaster$172kRecreation & Sports$109kHuman Services$98kHealth$74kHousing & Shelter$63kYouth Development$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $173k
$25,320
Median grant
6
States reached
$224k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
I GOT THIS FOUNDATION$41,450
ISRAAID$29,205
ALLEY-OOP KIDS$27,745
PALESTINE CHILDRENS'S RELIEF FUND (PCRF)$26,556
MBC TRAVELERS$25,320
ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY$12,800
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS$10,000
DISASTER RELIEF GRANT 1$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$1,650
BARUCH COLLEGE$1,575
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%I GOT THIS FOUNDATION: $41k → 11%ALLEY-OOP KIDS: $28k → 7%St John's University: $19k → 13%Texas A&M University: $18k → 22%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND: $100k → 14%Florida State University: $24k → 19%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $27k → 16%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $100k → 18%University of North Carolina - Charlotte: $38k → 10%University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill: $20k → 13%Brigham Young University: $34k → 8%University of Georgia: $30k → 27%University of Notre Dame: $21k → 13%Indiana University: $32k → 18%Northern Illinois University: $21k → 13%Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University: $23k → 21%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND: $100k → 14%Florida State University: $20k → 19%Michigan State University: $26k → 16%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $100k → 18%University of North Carolina - Charlotte: $30k → 10%Brigham Young University: $32k → 8%University of Notre Dame: $20k → 13%Indiana University: $22k → 18%Northern Illinois University Foundation: $19k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $50k → 19%Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University: $20k → 21%WARRIOR REUNION FOUNDATION: $98k → 11%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND: $100k → 14%FSU Foundation Inc: $34k → 19%Michigan State University: $22k → 16%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $100k → 18%University of North Carolina Charlotte Foundation: $25k → 10%Brigham Young University: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $40k → 19%MBC TRAVELERS: $25k → 12%Florida State University: $31k → 19%University of North Carolina - Charlotte: $23k → 10%University of Illinois: $35k → 19%FAIR OPPORTUNITY PROJECT: $30k → 10%University of Illinois Foundation: $32k → 19%University of Illinois: $32k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $30k → 19%University of Illinois: $25k → 19%ISRAAID: $29k → 14%PALESTINE CHILDRENS'S RELIEF FUND (PCRF): $27k → 14%DePaul University: $30k → 14%DIGS WITH DIGNITY: $63k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 185 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

185 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 181 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

185
181

Total granted

$3.8M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+38%

Still filing today

43%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCrime & LegalPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +13%
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $75k · revenue +25%
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $47k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • DR
    Disaster Relief Grants (4)
    one grant, 2018 · $128k
  • WR
    WARRIOR REUNION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $98k · revenue +3%
  • DW
    DIGS WITH DIGNITY CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $63k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
11
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is Women in Training Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

205 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 205 of the 383 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
205/205
Grantees still filing
178/205
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $211,890 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISDisaster Relief Grants (4): $127,993 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $112,375 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $103,678 · Other+113 more: $2,324,773 · Other+113 moreThurgood Marshall College Fund: $300,000 · EducationThurgood Marshall College FundDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $74,949 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $57,550 · Education+73 more: $1,083,681 · Education+73 moreSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $300,000 · Crime & LegalWARRIOR REUNION FOUNDATION: $98,012 · Public BenefitI Got This Foundation: $41,450 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern University: $4,500 · Recreation & SportsISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $29,205 · Public Safety & DisasterUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $15,700 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $9,900 · Philanthropy
Other$2,880,709Education$1,516,180Crime & Legal$300,000Public Benefit$98,012Recreation & Sports$45,950Public Safety & Disaster$29,205Philanthropy$25,600

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIOR REUNION FOUNDATION: $98,012 over 1y, 17% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $74,949 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIGS WITH DIGNITY CORPORATION: $63,411 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $57,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $46,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $45,025 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Carroll University: $43,840 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $41,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetI Got This Foundation: $41,450 over 1y, 22% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $40,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $34,241 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $33,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Florida State University Foundation Inc: $33,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $33,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR OPPORTUNITY PROJECT: $30,025 over 1y, 15% of budgetORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $29,205 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $26,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMBC Travelers Inc: $25,320 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $24,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $23,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $23,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $21,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $21,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN TRAINING INC: $20,225 over 1y, 10% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $19,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $19,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $18,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $17,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $16,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $16,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $15,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $15,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $15,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY: $15,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $12,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWalsh College of Accountancy & Business Administration: $12,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University: $12,140 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetClaremont McKenna College: $12,084 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFREE MOM HUGS INC: $11,940 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $11,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR REUNION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DIGS WITH DIGNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds John Carroll University ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds I Got This Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Florida State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ibm International FoundationNY42.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Ernst & Young Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · The Northrop Grumman Foundation · Deloitte Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grant Thornton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grant Thornton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Delaware: 25% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 8% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 4% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 2% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 2% of income from government
  • University of New Haven: 1% of income from government
  • Jacksonville University: 1% of income from government
  • Stetson University Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Loyola University Maryland Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Suffolk University: 1% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
  • Rollins College: 0% of income from government
  • Oral Roberts University: 0% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Eckerd College: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Bentley University: 0% of income from government
  • University of Oregon Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grant Thornton Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Grant Thornton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 383 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grant Thornton’s filings →

More from the funding graph