Skip to content

· Public charity

Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

To organize all workers for economic, moral, and social advancement of their conditions and status.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$209k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$951kCivil Rights$684kAnimals$631kSocial Science$225kHealth$165kCommunity Improvement$68kEducation$61kRecreation & Sports$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $371,447, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,360,912 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,989,465 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $259k
$14,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$266M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA$209,147
CREATIVE VISIONS$50,000
ACTION NETWORK Fund$42,500
ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL CIO$15,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF Airport Executives Foundat$14,000
COALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS$10,800
A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE$10,000
AFL-CIO SECRETARY-TREASURER$10,000
ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $681k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $10k → 20%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $10k → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $10k → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $10k → 21%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $209k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $96k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $86k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $85k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $82k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $72k → 14%MICHAEL & JOYCE DAY MEMORIAL GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA CHARITY GOLF TOURNAMENT: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 19 repeat orgs$993k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
17

Total granted

$2.0M
$876k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+53%

Still filing today

95%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesHealthEducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America
    7× · 2017–2024 · $641k · revenue +17%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $297k · revenue +4%
  • EP
    ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $225k · revenue +261%

Funded once

  • MA
    MISSOURI AFL-CIO
    one grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue -47%
  • CT
    Coalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • CT
    COALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
2
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
3
Afl-Cio Union Lawyers Alliance

Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of working men and women and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions…

—
4
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
5
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
6
American Federation of Labor&Congress of Industrial Orgs Napa&Solano

Labor organization

—
7
American Federation of Labor & Alameda Labor Council

To protect, maintain, and advance the interests of all working people in its territory; to secure legislation in the interest of the working people; to promote the formation of a committee on political education; to promote recognition and…

—
8
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825ABCDRRH

The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…

—
9
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
10
Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters

Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.

—
11
American Federation of Government Employees

To promote unity of action in all matters affecting the mutual interests of government civilian employees in general, all other persons providing their personal service directly to the united states government and for the organized workers…

Employment
12
Laborers' International Union of North America

To improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training, and employee benefits.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations; the most unlike its peers is St Vincent's Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
31/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSOURI AFL-CIO: $500,250 · OtherMISSOURI AFL-CIOCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO: $100,000 · OtherCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers spons…COALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS: $100,000 · OtherCOALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTSCOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS: $61,500 · OtherASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL -CIO: $45,000 · OtherGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $55,000 · OtherCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+17 more: $291,000 · Other+17 moreInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $640,840 · Human ServicesInternational Guiding Eye…PEDAL THE CAUSE: $30,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS: $297,357 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR RETI…LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT: $81,000 · Civil RightsLABOR COUNCIL FOR…Pension Rights Center: $40,000 · Civil RightsPension Rights Ce…NETROOTS NATION (F/K/A BLOGGERPOWERORG): $25,000 · Civil RightsNETROOTS NATION (…+1 more: $10,000 · Civil RightsECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $225,000 · Social ScienceLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $105,000 · HealthHEALTHY CALIFORNIA NOW: $50,000 · HealthLABOR CAMPAIGN FOR SINGLE PAYER HEALTHCARE: $35,000 · HealthCONSORTIUM FOR WORKER EDUCATION INC: $155,000 · EmploymentFARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE: $20,000 · EmploymentACTION NETWORK FUND: $42,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,202,750Human Services$680,840Civil Rights$453,357Social Science$225,000Health$190,000Employment$175,000Community Improvement$67,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $640,840 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetMISSOURI AFL-CIO: $500,250 over 1y, 10% of budgetALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS: $297,357 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $225,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCONSORTIUM FOR WORKER EDUCATION INC: $155,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $105,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT: $81,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetCOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS: $61,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTHY CALIFORNIA NOW: $50,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL -CIO: $45,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetACTION NETWORK FUND: $42,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetCOALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMEN: $40,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetPension Rights Center: $40,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLABOR CAMPAIGN FOR SINGLE PAYER HEALTHCARE: $35,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETROOTS NATION (F/K/A BLOGGERPOWERORG): $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE: $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetWISCONSIN STATE AFL-CIO: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE: $16,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FED OF LABOR & CONGRESS: $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetAEROSPACE MAINTENANCE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUFCW CHARITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS IRON SHIP BUILDERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Food and Commercial Workers International UnionDC22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Food and Commercial Workers International Union · American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · Unite Here · Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph