Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

To organize all workers for economic, moral, and social advancement of their conditions and status.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$209k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$681kCivil Rights$453kSocial Science$225kHealth$190kEmployment$175kCommunity Improvement$68kEducation$61kArts & Culture$50kEnvironment$10kOther$1.1M
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $371,447 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,360,912 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,989,465 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $259k
$14,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$266M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA$209,147
CREATIVE VISIONS$50,000
ACTION NETWORK Fund$42,500
ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL CIO$15,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF Airport Executives Foundat$14,000
COALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS$10,800
AFL-CIO SECRETARY-TREASURER$10,000
A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE$10,000
ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $681k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEARTSHARE ST VINCENT'S SERVICES: $10k → 20%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $10k → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $10k → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $10k → 21%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $209k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $96k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $86k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $85k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $82k → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $72k → 14%MICHAEL & JOYCE DAY MEMORIAL GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA CHARITY GOLF TOURNAMENT: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
OK
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 19 repeat orgs$993k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
17

Total granted

$2.0M
$876k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+18%

Still filing today

95%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesHealthEducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America
    7× · 2017–2024 · $641k · revenue +17%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $297k · revenue +4%
  • EP
    ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $225k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • MA
    MISSOURI AFL-CIO
    one grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue -47%
  • CT
    COALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • CT
    Coalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO
    one grant, 2020 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
2
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
3
Afl-Cio Union Lawyers Alliance

Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of working men and women and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions…

—
4
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
5
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
6
American Federation of Labor&Congress of Industrial Orgs Napa&Solano

Labor organization

—
7
American Federation of Labor & Alameda Labor Council

To protect, maintain, and advance the interests of all working people in its territory; to secure legislation in the interest of the working people; to promote the formation of a committee on political education; to promote recognition and…

—
8
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825ABCDRRH

The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…

—
9
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
10
Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters

Labor union maintaining and improving the benefit and working conditions of members engaged in the carpentry trade.

—
11
American Federation of Government Employees

To promote unity of action in all matters affecting the mutual interests of government civilian employees in general, all other persons providing their personal service directly to the united states government and for the organized workers…

Employment
12
Laborers' International Union of North America

To improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training, and employee benefits.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations and the most unlike its peers is St Vincent's Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterImmigrant Worker SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportSchool District FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%2/51
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,514

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
30/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MISSOURI AFL-CIO — $500,250 · OtherMISSOURI AFL-CIOCOALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS — $100,000 · OtherCOALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTSCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO — $100,000 · OtherCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers spons…COALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS — $61,500 · OtherASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL -CIO — $45,000 · OtherGeorgia State University Foundation Inc — $55,000 · OtherCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Other+17 more — $291,000 · Other+17 moreInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $640,840 · Human ServicesInternational Guiding Eye…PEDAL THE CAUSE — $30,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS — $297,357 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR RETI…LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT — $81,000 · Civil RightsLABOR COUNCIL FOR…Pension Rights Center — $40,000 · Civil RightsPension Rights Ce…NETROOTS NATION (F/K/A BLOGGERPOWERORG) — $25,000 · Civil RightsNETROOTS NATION (…+1 more — $10,000 · Civil RightsECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE — $225,000 · Social ScienceLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $105,000 · HealthHEALTHY CALIFORNIA NOW — $50,000 · HealthLABOR CAMPAIGN FOR SINGLE PAYER HEALTHCARE — $35,000 · HealthCONSORTIUM FOR WORKER EDUCATION INC — $155,000 · EmploymentFARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE — $20,000 · EmploymentACTION NETWORK FUND — $42,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,202,750Human Services$680,840Civil Rights$453,357Social Science$225,000Health$190,000Employment$175,000Community Improvement$67,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America — $640,840 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetMISSOURI AFL-CIO — $500,250 over 1y, 10% of budgetALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS — $297,357 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE — $225,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCONSORTIUM FOR WORKER EDUCATION INC — $155,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $105,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT — $81,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetCOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS — $61,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc — $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY CALIFORNIA NOW — $50,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL -CIO — $45,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetACTION NETWORK FUND — $42,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetPension Rights Center — $40,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCOALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMEN — $40,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetNATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLABOR CAMPAIGN FOR SINGLE PAYER HEALTHCARE — $35,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE — $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNETROOTS NATION (F/K/A BLOGGERPOWERORG) — $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN STATE AFL-CIO — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE — $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE — $16,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS IRON SHIP BUILDERS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FED OF LABOR & CONGRESS — $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT'S SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUFCW CHARITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAEROSPACE MAINTENANCE COUNCIL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Food and Comme…American Federation o…International Brother…Communications Worker…American Federation o…Unite HereInt Union United Auto…International Brother…Vanguard Charitable E…Amazonsmile Foundation
United Food and Commercial Workers International UnionDC22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Food and Commercial Workers International Union · American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · Unite Here · Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines