How much did GRACE K SALMON TRUST PAR 9 & 10 OW grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of GRACE K SALMON TRUST PAR 9 & 10 OW’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

03FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

CLASP HOMES$5,000
FRIENDS OF WESTPORT PUBLIC ART$5,000
STAPLES HIGH SCHOOL TUITION GRANTS$5,000
ASPETUCK LAND TRUST$5,000
THE SUSAN FUND$5,000
HOMES WITH HOPE INC$4,624
WESTPORT SCHOOL OF MUSIC$3,136
WESTPORT GARDEN CLUB$1,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against cost of living need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$699k · 17 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$699k

$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+86%

Still filing today

47%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentEducationAnimalsArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY
6× · 2018–2023 · $223k · revenue +81%
AL
ASPETUCK LAND TRUST
7× · 2018–2024 · $32k · revenue +57%
SH
STAPLES HIGH SCHOOL TUITION GRANTS
7× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue +54%

Funded once

WW
WESTPORT WOMAN'S CLUB INCgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +86%
WP
WESTPORT PUBLIC LIBRARY
one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Westport Police Association

To promote safety to the westport (ma) community.

Public Safety & Disaster

Wilton Land Conservation Trust

PROTECTING, ENHANCING AND CONSERVING open spaces encompassing MEADOWS, WOODLANDS, AND WATERWAYS IN THE town of Wilton CT.

Environment

The Westport Library Association

The westport library was established for the purpose of maintaining a public library in the town of westport, connecticut. the library is committed to empowering the individual and strengthening the community through dynamic interaction…

Education

Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health

Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

To develop and advocate public policies to allow for decent and affordable housing in ct.

—

Connecticut Association of Health Care

Providing services to and advocates for ct's providers of long-term and assisted living care.

—

Western Connecticut State University

The purpose of the association is to establish & maintain a mutually beneficial relationship with western conn. state university

Education

Wethersfield Historical Society

The purpose of the Society is to collect, preserve, and interpret Wethersfield's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations.

Arts & Culture

Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition

University of Hartford

The university provides a learning environment in which students may transform themselves intellectually, personally and socially.

Education

Connecticut Trust for Historic

Interacts with other groups, individuals and organizations to encourage, advocate and facilitate historical preservation throughout connecticut.

Arts & Culture

Western New England University

See Schedule O Statement for Part III, Line 1 that also applies to Part I, Line 1

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Staples High School Tuition Grants and the most unlike its peers is Westport School of Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/9

Grantees still filing

8/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$364,141Animals$222,513Education$57,930Environment$33,491Arts & Culture$20,421Health$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community FoundationCT15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation · The James & Mary Ellen Marpe Family · Howard & Katherine Aibel Foundation · Ge Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GRACE K SALMON TRUST PAR 9 & 10 OW funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE SUSAN FUND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 223174640 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE SUSAN FUND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Grace K Salmon Trust Par 9 & 10 Ow?

Find your warmest path to Grace K Salmon Trust Par 9 & 10 Ow through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GRACE K SALMON TRUST PAR 9 & 10 OW

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Grace K Salmon Trust Par 9 & 10 Ow?

More from the funding graph

GRACE K SALMON TRUST PAR 9 & 10 OW

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Grace K Salmon Trust Par 9 & 10 Ow?

More from the funding graph