· Private foundation
Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $745k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $650k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GATHERING PLACE | $150,000 |
| TULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT | $100,000 |
| LIFE SENIOR SERVICES | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS NE OKLAHOMA | $50,000 |
| OSU FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $50,000 |
| 1ST STEP MALE DIVERSION PROGRAM | $50,000 |
| FAMILY SAFETY CENTER | $50,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA | $50,000 |
| TOWN & COUNTRY SCHOOL | $30,771 |
| TULSA BOTANCIAL GARDEN | $30,000 |
| DVIS | $30,000 |
| CENTER FOR IND WPHY CHALLENGE | $28,800 |
| NEW VIEW OKLAHOMA | $26,200 |
| PARENT CHILD CENTER OF TULSA | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
97 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Parkside Inc3× · 2018–2020 · $375k · revenue +107%- TZTULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT INC5× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +46%
A NEW LEAF INC5× · 2017–2024 · $348k · revenue +136%
Funded once
- MCMORTON COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH SERVone grant, 2017 · $60k
TULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $56k · revenue +58%
Rogers State University Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +53%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.
Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.
Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…
The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.
La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.
Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.
The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.
111Tulsa exists to mobilize the local church to see that no child is without a family in Tulsa County.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is Akdar Temple Shriners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
106 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 106 of the 162 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Parkside Inc ↗
- Who funds TULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC ↗
- Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds 12 & 12 INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC ↗
- Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
- Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Resonance Center for Women Inc ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
- Who funds The Town & Country School Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds REVITALIZE T-TOWN ↗
- Who funds BOSTON AVENUE HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds 1ST STEP MALE DIVERSION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network ↗
- Who funds PHILOS HOSPITALITY INC ↗
- Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Center Inc ↗
- Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds TULSA COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Modus Inc ↗
- Who funds The Pencil Box Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Newview Oklahoma Inc — 45% of income from government
- Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc — 37% of income from government
- Rogers State University Foundation — 20% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Intervention Services — 15% of income from government
- Ability Resources Inc — 15% of income from government
- Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc — 13% of income from government
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Youth Services of Tulsa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
- The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc — 4% of income from government
- Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.