Skip to content
Gp Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gp Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MEducation$320kPhilanthropy$250kHealth$38kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL AVREICHIM$120,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER ORLANDO & OSCEOLA COUNTY$5,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMS: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 4 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+8%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyReligionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CONSORTIUM OF JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $275k · revenue +82%
  • CY
    CHASDEI YISROEL INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $250k · revenue +70%
  • CY
    Chinuch Yehudi Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $175k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +8%
  • CY
    CONGREGATION YESHIVAS MEON HATORAH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $36k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF OROT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chevrah Lomdei Mishnah Inc

Promoting study of Mishnah and other Jewish texts

Religion
2
American Friends of Yeshivas Toras Moshe

Support of religious study and testing for credit recommendations subject to the approval of national ccrs, a program of the board of regents of the university of the state of new york.

International
3
Yeshiva Nishmas Hatorah Inc

An institution for higher learning and study of talmudic law for post high school students, and students returning from their studies in israel, where they can further their education.

Religion
4
Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School Ltd (Formerly the Meorot Inst)

To train rabbis, educators, and leaders who embody this vision in their teaching of torah, their spiritual support of individuals, and their building of diverse and welcoming communities; to foster and strengthen a network of rabbis and…

Education
5
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
6
Ruach Chaim Inc

Educational and charitable

Religion
7
Yeshiva Derech Torah of Monsey Inc

To provide children with an outstanding Jewish and Secular education.

Education
8
Hitmasrut Inc

Jewish educational programs

Religion
9
Yeshivas Ohr Yissochor Academy Inc

To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
10
Yeshivas Nachlas Sofrim Inc

To cultivate students' intellectual, moral and creative capacities to the fullest by transmitting the necessary skills and methods that enable students to master all areas of torah scholarship.

Religion
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
Yeshivat Ohel Torah

To conduct a school for Hebrew religious education

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOLLEL AVREICHIM OF BROOKLYN: $830,000 · OtherKOLLEL AVREICHIM OF BROOKLYNCONGREGATION YESHIVAS MEON HATORAH INC: $36,000 · Other+4 more: $65,000 · Other+4 moreCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $250,000 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI YISROEL INCChinuch Yehudi Inc: $175,000 · PhilanthropyChinuch Yehudi IncCONSORTIUM OF JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS INC: $275,000 · ReligionCONSORTIUM OF JEWI…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $50,000 · InternationalMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSchools That Can: $20,000 · EducationCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Health
Other$931,000Philanthropy$425,000Religion$275,000International$50,000Human Services$25,000Education$20,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSORTIUM OF JEWISH DAY SCHOOLS INC: $275,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $250,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetChinuch Yehudi Inc: $175,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSchools That Can: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Greater Orlando and Osceola County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ojc FundNY14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gp Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gp Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Habitat for Humanity Greater Orlando and Osceola County Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gp Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gp Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gp Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home