Skip to content

· Private foundation

Goyanes Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$338k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Public Benefit$725kCrime & Legal$530kArts & Culture$273kSocial Science$225kEducation$193kEnvironment$150kCommunity Improvement$92kHuman Services$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $181k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $157k
$37,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$90,000
CATO INSTITUTE$67,000
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC$40,000
A T STILL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH$37,500
TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION$37,500
CATSKILL ART SOCIETY INC$28,000
MOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE$22,500
ACCURACY IN MEDIA$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $25k → 12%AREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY AND HUMAN SERVICES: $27k → 21%GOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $25k → 12%AREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY AND HUMAN SERVICES: $13k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 12 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$2.1M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+75%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitArts & CultureAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $530k · revenue +57%
  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $487k · revenue +93%
  • TP
    TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $238k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • PP
    POLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +32%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +75%
  • BF
    BAIRD FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +189%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Allbritton Journalism Institute

Allbritton journalism institute aims to train a new generation of non-partisan political reporters from diverse backgrounds to produce high-quality, fact-based journalism.

Education
7
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
8
The Institute for Law and Strategy

This institute, unlike many institutions concerned with law and public affairs, will not devote itself to advocacy or lobbying, to litigation, or to holding large-scale public events. rather, it will focus on collaboration with established…

Civil Rights
9
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
10
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
11
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
12
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moving Picture Institute; the most unlike its peers is Baird Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATO INSTITUTE: $487,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTETEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $237,500 · Public BenefitTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATIONMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $225,300 · Public BenefitMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INCINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $530,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICEMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $122,500 · Arts & CultureMOVING PICTUR…CATSKILL ART SOCIETY INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureCATSKILL ART …ACCURACY IN MEDIA INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureACCURACY IN M…A T Still University of Health Sciences: $117,500 · EducationA T Still…POLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $75,000 · EducationPOLY PREP…GUADALUPE RIVER CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMIT: $100,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $50,000 · AnimalsGOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $50,000 · Human ServicesAREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES: $39,935 · Human ServicesAREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY: $52,057 · OtherBAIRD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Other
Public Benefit$949,800Civil Rights$530,000Arts & Culture$272,500Education$192,500Animals$150,000Human Services$89,935Other$62,057

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $530,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $487,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $237,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $225,300 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $122,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCATSKILL ART SOCIETY INC: $120,000 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetA T Still University of Health Sciences: $117,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUADALUPE RIVER CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMIT: $100,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetPOLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOT YOUR SIX SUPPORT DOGS: $50,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES: $39,935 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetACCURACY IN MEDIA INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBAIRD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goyanes Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goyanes Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Goyanes Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph