· Public charity
Gospel Volunteers Inc
Promoting the christian faith.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $72k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $92k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PIONEERS - USA | $92,000 |
| THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE | $25,000 |
| AFRICA INLAND MISSION | $15,750 |
| STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL | $11,250 |
| GLOBAL FAITH NETWORK | $10,000 |
| UNLIMITED POTENTIAL MISSIONS | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Grants abroad, by region: $38k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: ENGLISH TEACHING
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 6% of Gospel Volunteers Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.
5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BPBarnabas & Partners6× · 2017–2023 · $549k · revenue -88% · 39% of their budget
- PPIONEERS7× · 2018–2024 · $392k
- AIAFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED8× · 2017–2024 · $135k
Funded once
- MFMIO Frontiersone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +11%
- WOWORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INCone grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue -11%
- DTDISCIPLING THE NATIONSone grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -9%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Training pastors in third world countries
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.
To equip disciples of Jesus Christ to balance and live their lives to glorify God in every area of life; spirituall, personally, communally and physically by
To Train Christian Leaders and Plant Churches in China
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
World outreach
Pastor training
Promote the expansion of the Gospel by providing stipends for expenses for cross-cultural church planters
Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Gospel Volunteers Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gospel Volunteers Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Gospel Volunteers’ filings →