Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gordon & Llura Gund 1993 Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$17MEducation$12MEnvironment$12MArts & Culture$3.7MInternational$2.6MRecreation & Sports$1.8MPhilanthropy$740kAnimals$275kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+13 grants · $8.0M
$200,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$751k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EARTH JUSTICE$2,000,000
FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$882,000
OSA CONSERVATION$500,000
GROUNDS FOR SCULPTURE$500,000
THE BOLLES SCHOOL$500,000
UVM FOUNDATION$500,000
Individual grant recipient$450,000
AUTISM SPEAKS$430,000
CENTER FOR MIND BODY MEDICINE$400,000
SHATTERPROOF$350,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND$250,000
ACHILLES INTERNATIONAL$250,000
RESEARCH AMERICA$200,000
CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $700k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FIGHT FOR CHILDREN INC: $100k → 14%TRINITY COUNSELING SERVICE: $50k → 11%TRINITY COUNSELING SERVICE: $50k → 11%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $250k → 7%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%TRINITY COUNSELING SERVICE: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
OK
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46M · 49 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
12

Total granted

$46M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-13%

Still filing today

65%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EARTHJUSTICE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $10M · revenue +82%
  • THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +49%
  • TB
    THE BOLLES SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • UM
    UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF PRINCENTON
    one grant, 2018 · $300k
  • TN
    THE NANTUCKET PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $183k
  • UH
    UPENN - HEART FAILURE ADVANCED PRACTICE
    one grant, 2023 · $182k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fight for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Future Vision Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
26/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FULL FRAME INITIATIVE INC: $2,400,000 · OtherTHE FULL FRAME INITIATIVE INCIndividual grant recipient: $1,750,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLEVELAND CLINIC: $1,100,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICRESEARCHAMERICA: $1,100,000 · OtherRESEARCHAMERICASAY YES TO EDUCATION INC: $1,000,000 · OtherSAY YES TO EDUCATION INCSTUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000,000 · OtherSTUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INCNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $800,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $600,000 · Other+33 more: $6,157,333 · Other+33 moreEARTHJUSTICE: $10,000,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC: $1,500,000 · EnvironmentMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC+2 more: $240,000 · EnvironmentTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $5,895,325 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING …SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,200,000 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT…MAYO CLINIC: $1,125,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $860,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INCMIRACLEFEET: $700,000 · HealthMIRACLEFEETTHE CENTER FOR MIND-BODY MEDICINE: $500,000 · Health+1 more: $215,000 · HealthTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4,372,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIV…THE BOLLES SCHOOL: $2,250,000 · EducationTHE BOLLES SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VERMON…DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $750,000 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITY+4 more: $395,000 · EducationGROUNDS FOR SCULPTURE INC: $2,000,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER CLEVELAND SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $250,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $100,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $75,000 · Arts & CultureATHLETES FOR HOPE: $700,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200,000 · Human ServicesCENTER AT 353 INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesFIGHT FOR CHILDREN INC: $100,000 · Human Services
Other$17,107,333Environment$11,740,000Health$11,495,325Education$9,767,000Arts & Culture$2,425,000Youth Development$700,000Human Services$700,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $10,000,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $5,895,325 over 4y, 10% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4,372,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FULL FRAME INITIATIVE INC: $2,400,000 over 3y, 52% of budgetTHE BOLLES SCHOOL: $2,250,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,200,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetGROUNDS FOR SCULPTURE INC: $2,000,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC: $1,500,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,125,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCHAMERICA: $1,100,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSAY YES TO EDUCATION INC: $1,000,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetSTUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $860,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $750,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetATHLETES FOR HOPE: $700,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetMIRACLEFEET: $700,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetAchilles International Inc: $500,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR MIND-BODY MEDICINE: $500,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF PHILADELPHIA: $300,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $250,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $250,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetPRINCETON NATIONAL ROWING ASSOCIATION: $250,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $250,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC: $220,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC: $215,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPAY FIRST INC: $200,000 over 4y, 81% of budgetCENTER AT 353 INC: $150,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTHE DECENCY FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetTHE WATERSHED INSTITUTE INC: $140,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED STATES ASSOCIATION OF BLIND ATHLETES INC: $135,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetISLES INC: $125,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFIGHT FOR CHILDREN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetTHE MAX WARBURG COURAGE CURRICULUM INC: $75,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetFUTURE VISION FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetWILDAID INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWhittier College: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE FULL FRAME INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOLLES SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDS FOR SCULPTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS OUT FRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCHAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SAY YES TO EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ATHLETES FOR HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLEFEET ↗
  • Who funds Achilles International Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR MIND-BODY MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND SPORTS HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON NATIONAL ROWING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SPAY FIRST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gordon and Llura Gund FoundationNJ32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gordon and Llura Gund Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gordon & Llura Gund 1993 Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gordon & Llura Gund 1993 Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Isles Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Watershed Institute Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Grounds for Sculpture Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Epiphany School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gordon & Llura Gund 1993 Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gordon & Llura Gund 1993 Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gordon & Llura Gund 1993’s filings →

More from the funding graph