Skip to content
Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona

See schedule o.

$457k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$1.1MInternational$221kHuman Services$66kEmployment$60kRecreation & Sports$39kArts & Culture$25kHousing & Shelter$25kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$391M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIZONA GOODWILL EDUCATION SERVICES$350,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA INC$50,000
EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hunger Related Events: $8k → 11%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 11%RYAN HOUSE: $27k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$619k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’26
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $968k · revenue +29%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA
    5× · 2019–2026 · $247k · revenue +22%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2019–2022 · $50k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • AS
    ARIZONA SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSION
    one grant, 2024 · $39k · revenue 0%
  • RH
    RYAN HOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $27k · revenue +6%
  • P2
    PLATOON 22 INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
4
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
5
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
6
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
7
Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.

Health
8
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
9
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
10
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
11
Home Matters to Arizona

Home matters to arizona is the first statewide home matters initiative focused on a new generation of affordable housing, connected communities, and healthier individuals, families, and economies. we add housing units while encouraging…

Housing & Shelter
12
Education Forward Arizona

To advocate for high-quality education and training that aligns with career and workforce opportunities to advance the quality of life for all arizonans.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf; the most unlike its peers is Hunger Related Events. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $968,219 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATIONAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $45,000 · Health+4 more: $84,386 · Health+4 moreArizona Goodwill Education Services: $350,000 · EducationArizona Goodwill Ed…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $247,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVE…Best Buddies International Inc: $23,529 · InternationalBest Buddies I…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsARIZONA SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSION: $38,625 · Recreation & SportsSWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesRYAN HOUSE: $26,698 · Human ServicesHUNGER RELATED EVENTS: $8,290 · Human ServicesYAVAPAI CASA FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $6,544 · Human ServicesCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $25,202 · Crime & LegalMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterPLUMAJE: $15,000 · OtherGREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 · OtherRoosevelt Row Community Development Corporation: $10,000 · Other
Health$1,147,605Education$350,000International$270,529Recreation & Sports$108,625Human Services$91,532Crime & Legal$25,202Housing & Shelter$25,000Other$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $968,219 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $247,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetARIZONA SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSION: $38,625 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetA NEW LEAF: $33,862 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRYAN HOUSE: $26,698 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $25,202 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLATOON 22 INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $23,529 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCancer Support Community Arizona: $15,524 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSOLARI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRoosevelt Row Community Development Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHUNGER RELATED EVENTS: $8,290 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetYAVAPAI CASA FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $6,544 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Valley of the Sun Uni…Burton Family Foundat…American Express Foun…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arizona Community FoundationAZ16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · Burton Family Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Goodwill Industries International Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home