· Public charity
Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona
See schedule o.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $585,134 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,777,111 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,191,977 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $109k
- $250k+1 grant · $468k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Honor Health Foundation | $468,219 |
| AZ Sports & Entertainment Commission | $38,625 |
| Goodwill Industries International | $30,000 |
| Swift Youth Foundation | $20,000 |
| Solari Crisis and Human Services | $10,000 |
| Child Crisis Arizona | $10,000 |
| Hunger Related Events | $8,290 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $968k · revenue +29%
- JAJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA4× · 2019–2023 · $197k · revenue +22%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc2× · 2019–2022 · $50k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- RHRYAN HOUSEone grant, 2019 · $27k · revenue +6%
- MHMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERSgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +25%
- P2PLATOON 22 INCone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.
Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.
To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.
Banner health's nonprofit mission is "making health care easier, so life can be better".
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
Home matters to arizona is the first statewide home matters initiative focused on a new generation of affordable housing, connected communities, and healthier individuals, families, and economies. we add housing units while encouraging…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf and the most unlike its peers is Hunger Related Events. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF ↗
- Who funds RYAN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS ↗
- Who funds PLATOON 22 INC ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds SWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cancer Support Community Arizona ↗
- Who funds SOLARI INC ↗
- Who funds Roosevelt Row Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds GREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds HUNGER RELATED EVENTS ↗
- Who funds YAVAPAI CASA FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · Burton Family Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Goodwill Industries International Inc — 35% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.