Skip to content
Goodrx Helps Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Goodrx Helps Inc

Deliver resources and education to help those who are unable to access healthcare due to systemic barriers.

$175k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$219k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $25,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $175,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $150,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$67k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SoTexas Family Planning & Health Corp$15,000
West Alabama Women's Center$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Hope Med Clinic - Get Up Project: $14k → 10%Spring Branch Comm Health Ctr: $15k → 16%SoTexas Family Planning & Health Corp: $15k → 17%Smith Medical Clinic Inc: $6k → 15%Good Shepherd Free Med Clinic: $14k → 18%St Pete Free Clinic Inc: $10k → 12%Health Unit on Davison Avenue: $10k → 21%West Alabama Women's Center: $10k → 17%ICT Street Team: $6k → 16%Albemarle Hospital Foundation: $10k → 15%Our House Inc: $10k → 13%Clarkston Community Health Ctr: $12k → 14%Viola Startzman Clinic: $10k → 10%Jackson Medical Mall Foundation: $25k → 23%Community Free Clinic Inc: $8k → 12%Shepherd's Clinic Inc: $12k → 19%Good Shepherd Free Medical Clinic of Laurens County: $8k → 18%St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $8k → 12%Community Free Clinic Inc: $6k → 12%Shepherd's Clinic: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
OH
MD
KS
NC
SC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$76k · 4 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$76k
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SHEPHERDS CLINIC INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $22k · revenue +125%
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF LAURENS COUNTY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $22k · revenue -11%
  • St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $18k · revenue -18%

Funded once

  • JM
    JACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -8%
  • SB
    SPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +18%
  • GU
    GET UP PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Smithville Community Clinic

Free and charitable meadical clinic that provides basic medical services, behavioral health assessments/counseling, well women's check ups, and dental services. opportunities provided for community volunteers and medical professionals.

Health
2
Willing Helpers Medical Inc

To assist in providing medical care to the uninsured of newton- jasper and walton counties

Health
3
Rock Springs Clinic

To provide medical care to unisured low income patients.

Health
4
East Knox Free Medical Clinic Inc

Free Medical Care

Health
5
Hope Clinic and Care Center Inc

To provide health care services in a holistic manner to patients who meet the clinic's eligibility requirements, currently income less than 300% of the federal poverty level.

Human Services
6
Henderson County Free Medical Clinic Inc

The free clinics (tfc) enhances the healthcare system in henderson county and neighboring communities to ensure the accessibility of quality healthcare for uninsured, low-income clients. tfc works with volunteers and partnering healthcare…

Health
7
Christ Clinic

Providing reliable, accessible, high quality medical services to the most vunerable people in our community.

Health
8
Christian Health Center of Howard County

The mission of the christian health clinic of howard county is to provide medical services, including dentistry and pharmacy, to the people of the county who cannot obtain medical care because of inability to pay.

Health
9
Good Samaritan Free Clinic Inc

We provide medical services to uninsured and underinsured in our community. This year our mission included assisting the Rescue Mission with healthcare for their residents as well as seeing patients at our clinic.

Health
10
Fayette Care Clinic Inc

To provide a medical home in Fayette County for lower-income, uninsured adults and caring for them always with Compassion and Respect for everyone.

Health
11
Shared Christian Ministries

Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.

Health
12
Orangeburg Calhoun Free Medical Clinic Inc

Provide medical care to individuals that are 200% below the poverty level in a primary care setting. this will include examination, treatment and medication. individuals will be screened before being seen to be sure they meet financial…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Free Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nurses Global Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthJACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATIONGOOD SHEPHERD FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF LAURENS COUNTY: $22,000 · HealthGOOD SHEPHERD FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF LAURENS COUNTYSOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION: $15,000 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATIONSPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $15,000 · HealthSPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC: $14,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INCCLARKSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $12,000 · HealthCLARKSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERHEALTHCARE 2000 COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $10,000 · HealthHEALTHCARE 2000 COMMUNITY CLINIC INCWest Alabama Womens Center Inc: $10,000 · HealthWest Alabama Womens Center IncHealth Unit on Davison Avenue: $10,000 · HealthHealth Unit on Davison AvenueALBEMARLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthALBEMARLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONNurses Global Outreach Inc: $6,000 · HealthSHEPHERDS CLINIC INC: $22,000 · OtherSHEPHERDS CLINIC INCSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $18,000 · OtherSt Petersburg Free Clinic In…OUR HOUSE INC: $10,000 · OtherOUR HOUSE INCSMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $6,000 · OtherSMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INCGET UP PROJECT: $14,000 · International
Health$149,000Other$56,000International$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHEPHERDS CLINIC INC: $22,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF LAURENS COUNTY: $22,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGET UP PROJECT: $14,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCLARKSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $12,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHEALTHCARE 2000 COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWest Alabama Womens Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHealth Unit on Davison Avenue: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetALBEMARLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Americares Foundation…Direct ReliefFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Americares Foundation IncCT25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goodrx Helps Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goodrx Helps Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $33k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Goodrx Helps’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home