· Public charity
Goodrx Helps Inc
Deliver resources and education to help those who are unable to access healthcare due to systemic barriers.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $25,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $175,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $150,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SoTexas Family Planning & Health Corp | $15,000 |
| West Alabama Women's Center | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSHEPHERDS CLINIC INC2× · 2022–2023 · $22k · revenue +125%
- GSGOOD SHEPHERD FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF LAURENS COUNTY2× · 2022–2023 · $22k · revenue -11%
St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc2× · 2022–2023 · $18k · revenue -18%
Funded once
- JMJACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -8%
- SBSPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +18%
- GUGET UP PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Free and charitable meadical clinic that provides basic medical services, behavioral health assessments/counseling, well women's check ups, and dental services. opportunities provided for community volunteers and medical professionals.
To assist in providing medical care to the uninsured of newton- jasper and walton counties
To provide medical care to unisured low income patients.
Free Medical Care
To provide health care services in a holistic manner to patients who meet the clinic's eligibility requirements, currently income less than 300% of the federal poverty level.
The free clinics (tfc) enhances the healthcare system in henderson county and neighboring communities to ensure the accessibility of quality healthcare for uninsured, low-income clients. tfc works with volunteers and partnering healthcare…
Providing reliable, accessible, high quality medical services to the most vunerable people in our community.
The mission of the christian health clinic of howard county is to provide medical services, including dentistry and pharmacy, to the people of the county who cannot obtain medical care because of inability to pay.
We provide medical services to uninsured and underinsured in our community. This year our mission included assisting the Rescue Mission with healthcare for their residents as well as seeing patients at our clinic.
To provide a medical home in Fayette County for lower-income, uninsured adults and caring for them always with Compassion and Respect for everyone.
Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.
Provide medical care to individuals that are 200% below the poverty level in a primary care setting. this will include examination, treatment and medication. individuals will be screened before being seen to be sure they meet financial…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Free Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nurses Global Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF LAURENS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS FAMILY PLANNING & HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SPRING BRANCH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds GET UP PROJECT ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds CLARKSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCARE 2000 COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds West Alabama Womens Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Health Unit on Davison Avenue ↗
- Who funds ALBEMARLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SMITH MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Nurses Global Outreach Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Goodrx Helps Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.