Skip to content
Good Stuff Thrift Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Good Stuff Thrift Inc

Our mission is to operate the most efficient thrift stores possible in order to maximize funding to our charities so they can help children in our community.

$942k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$904kHuman Services$349kYouth Development$239kEducation$214kReligion$68kRecreation & Sports$33kFood & Nutrition$32k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $872,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $942,182 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $70,182 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $758k
$69,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE LEARNING CENTER$111,000
CHRIST HOME$108,000
LENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION$95,000
ANN SILVERMAN FREE CLINIC$90,000
CHOICE ONE$88,000
YOUNG LIFE$78,000
HUNTING PARK CHRISTIAN ACADEM$69,000
JESUS FOCUES MISNISTRY$68,000
LAKESIDE$51,000
TREEHOUSE$35,000
CARSON SIMPSON CAMP$33,000
VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$20,000
BABY BUREAU$13,000
EVERY GOOD GIFT$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $410k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRIST HOME: $130k → 6%CHRIST HOME: $108k → 6%BABY BUREAU: $25k → 6%LAKESIDE: $51k → 7%BABY BUREAU: $13k → 6%LAKESIDE: $10k → 7%EVERY GOOD GIFT: $25k → 7%EVERY GOOD GIFT: $13k → 7%BETHANNA: $35k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$208k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$1.6M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+97%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHRISTS HOME
    2× · 2023–2024 · $238k · revenue +51%
  • LV
    LENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $225k · revenue +28%
  • AS
    ANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $220k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • TI
    TREEHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue -26%
  • B
    BETHANNAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presbyterian Children's Homes & Services

Presbyterian children's homes and services provides a variety of christ-centered care and support to children and families in need.

Human Services
2
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
3
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
4
The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…

Human Services
5
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
6
Allegheny Christian Ministries Inc D/B/a Laurel View Village

The organization owns and operates a long-term care facility and provides housing services to the elderly.

—
7
First Presbyterian Church Counseling Center Inc

Christian psychological counseling

Health
8
Sonshine Day Preschool Inc

Sonshine day preschools mission is to partner with the home and church to provide a loving, secure christian environment where dedicated staff care for, nuture, and teach young children to know, honor, and serve god.

—
9
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
10
Presbyterian Homes and Services

The mission of presbyterian homes & services, inc. is to honor god by enriching the lives and touching the hearts of older adults.

—
11
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
12
Chartiers Center

Chartiers believes each individual, regardless of economic status, has a right to achieve his/her highest potential and become a self-sufficient and full participating member of the community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christs Home; the most unlike its peers is Baby Bureau. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $225,000 · HealthLENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATIONANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $220,000 · HealthANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICChoiceOne Pregnancy & Sexual Health Resource Center Inc: $178,000 · HealthChoiceOne Pregnancy & Sexual Health Resour…TREEHOUSE INC: $70,000 · HealthTREEHOUSE INCHOPE LEARNING CENTER AT SUNSET RIDGE FARM: $211,000 · OtherHOPE LEARNING CENTER AT SU…JESUS FOCUS MINISTRY INC: $68,000 · OtherJESUS FOCUS MINISTRY INCEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONFERENCE: $64,500 · OtherEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONFE…VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FO…TREEHOUSE: $35,000 · OtherTREEHOUSECHRISTS HOME: $238,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTS HOMELAKESIDE YOUTH SERVICE: $61,000 · Human ServicesLAKESIDE YOUTH SERVICEEVERY GOOD GIFT: $38,000 · Human ServicesEVERY GOOD GIFTBABY BUREAU: $38,000 · Human ServicesBABY BUREAUBETHANNA: $35,000 · Human ServicesBETHANNAHunting Park Christian Academy: $159,000 · EducationHunting P…YOUNG LIFE: $143,000 · Youth Development
Health$693,000Other$433,500Human Services$410,000Education$159,000Youth Development$143,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTS HOME: $238,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $220,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetHOPE LEARNING CENTER AT SUNSET RIDGE FARM: $211,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetChoiceOne Pregnancy & Sexual Health Resource Center Inc: $178,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetHunting Park Christian Academy: $159,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $143,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE INC: $70,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetJESUS FOCUS MINISTRY INC: $68,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLAKESIDE YOUTH SERVICE: $61,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEVERY GOOD GIFT: $38,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetBABY BUREAU: $38,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetBETHANNA: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundations Community…Charities Aid Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Foundations Community PartnershipPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundations Community Partnership · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good Stuff Thrift Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good Stuff Thrift Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Good Stuff Thrift Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Good Stuff Thrift Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Good Stuff Thrift’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home