Skip to content

· Public charity

Good Neighbor Fund-Spirit Lake

Solicit local donations by community wide appeal and redistribute to local charitable agencies requesting donations that meet prescribed conditions set by the board.

$122k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$295kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kHousing & Shelter$50kArts & Culture$48kCommunity Improvement$40kCivil Rights$28kCrime & Legal$24kRecreation & Sports$22kOther$0
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $89,559, the rows itemized in this filing. The $122,381 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,822 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k9 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$6,015
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARNOLDS PARK LIBRARY FOUND$12,097
CAMP FOSTER$11,949
Individual grant recipient$11,766
UPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY$6,636
IMAGINATION LIBRARY$6,103
VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER$6,015
AMERICAN RED CROSS$6,015
HOPE HAVEN$5,949
SPIRIT LAKE YOUTH ATHLETICS$5,938
IOWA GREAT LAKES FISHING CLUB$5,936
LAKES AREA SENIOR CITIZENS$5,711
DISCOVERY HOUSE$5,444
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHERISH CENTER: $6k → 12%CAMP FOSTER: $18k → 7%BEDELL YMCA: $15k → 7%BEDELL YMCA: $14k → 7%CAMP FOSTER: $12k → 7%BEDELL YMCA: $12k → 7%BEDELL YMCA: $12k → 7%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $1k → 9%BEDELL YMCA: $11k → 7%BEDELL YMCA: $10k → 7%CAMP FOSTER-YMCA: $9k → 7%CAMP FOSTER-YMCA: $9k → 7%CAMP FOSTER - YMCA: $7k → 7%CAMP FOSTER - YMCA: $6k → 7%CAMP FOSTER - YMCA: $6k → 7%CAMP FOSTER - YMCA: $6k → 7%CHERISH CENTER: $9k → 7%ATLAS: $8k → 7%CHERISH CENTER: $7k → 7%CHERISH CENTER: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$589k · 14 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$589k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsHealthCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc
    9× · 2017–2026 · $145k · revenue +22%
  • UD
    UPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC
    8× · 2017–2026 · $47k · revenue +38%
  • PL
    PEARSON LAKES ART CENTER
    6× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • DC
    DICKINSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2025 · $12k · revenue 0%
  • FC
    FAMILY CRISIS
    one grant, 2025 · $11k
  • HR
    HOPE ROLLS INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spencer Little League Association

The purpose of Spencer Little League Association is to firmly implant in our youth the ideals of sportsmanship, honesty, loyalty, courage and respect for leadership while providing opportunities for our youth to play organized baseball and…

—
2
Des Moines Area Association of Realtors Foundation
Education
3
Compass Pointe

Provide counseling and education for the prevention of alcohol and drug related problems to the residents of northwest iowa.

—
4
Iowa Outlaws Inc
—
5
Central Mn Council of Boy Scouts of America

It is the mission of the boy scouts of america to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout law and oath.

—
6
Central Iowa Juvenile Detention Center

To provide a highly structured environment which emphasizes a safety and security to all juveniles while serving as a deterrent to criminal and anti-social behaviors. Working youth in the center and communities.

—
7
Iowa Sports Expo Group Inc
Recreation & Sports
8
Winnebago Council Boy Scouts of America #173

Providing service to young men ages 7-21 and young women ages 14-21 within 17 counties of the state of iowa, by promoting the ability of young men and women to do things for themselves and others, training them in scoutcraft and teaching…

—
9
Ywca of Fort Dodge Ia

We are a state licensed substance abuse facility which functions to provide a clinically managed residence treatment center for women and women with children.

—
10
Prairielands Council 117 Boy Scouts of America

Boy scout council is devoted to promoting the ability of boys, young men, and women to do things for themselves and others, training them in scoutcraft, and teach them patriotism, courage, and self-reliance. the council also prepares them…

—
11
Wadena Hockey Club

Provide hockey coaches, equipment, and maintain an ice arena for youth in the community. member of mn hockey to provide leagues and tournaments.

Recreation & Sports
12
Grantsburg Hockey Association

Organizations mission-to provide a hockey rink and related support buildings, equip., etc., so the area youth can play hockey. to educate the interested in the fundamentals of ice hockey. to promote sportsmanship.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lakes Area Hockey Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS: $62,217 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSHOPE HAVEN: $55,390 · OtherHOPE HAVENVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF THE IOWA GREAT LAKES INC: $34,432 · OtherVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF THE IOWA GREAT LAKES INCIndividual grant recipient: $34,177 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAKES AREA SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $33,918 · OtherLAKES AREA SENIOR CITIZENS CENTERCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA: $23,781 · OtherCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSASPIRIT LAKE YOUTH ATHLETICS: $17,103 · Other+13 more: $102,174 · Other+13 moreCamp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc: $144,516 · Human ServicesCamp Foster Young Mens Chris…CHERISH CENTER: $27,486 · Human ServicesCHERISH CENTERATLAS OF THE LAKES AREA: $7,635 · Human Services+1 more: $1,285 · Human ServicesDISCOVERY HOUSE INC: $55,277 · HealthPEARSON LAKES ART CENTER: $35,686 · Arts & CultureDICKINSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $12,313 · Arts & CultureUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $46,584 · Community ImprovementIOWA GREAT LAKES FISHING CLUB: $5,936 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTHWEST IOWA: $5,775 · AnimalsLAKES AREA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $11,329 · Recreation & Sports
Other$363,192Human Services$180,922Health$55,277Arts & Culture$47,999Community Improvement$46,584Animals$11,711Recreation & Sports$11,329

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCamp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc: $144,516 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetDISCOVERY HOUSE INC: $55,277 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $46,584 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPEARSON LAKES ART CENTER: $35,686 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCHERISH CENTER: $27,486 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA: $23,781 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetDICKINSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $12,313 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetLAKES AREA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $11,329 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetATLAS OF THE LAKES AREA: $7,635 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER IOWA: $7,284 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetATLAS OF SPENCER: $1,285 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PEARSON LAKES ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHERISH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA ↗
  • Who funds DICKINSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LAKES AREA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS OF THE LAKES AREA ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER IOWA ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA GREAT LAKES FISHING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTHWEST IOWA ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS OF SPENCER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA33.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Anne Thorne Weaver Family Foundation Inc · Iowa Lakes Electric Members Charitable Foundation · Dwight and Marilyn Conover Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good Neighbor Fund-Spirit Lake funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good Neighbor Fund-Spirit Lake. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Good Neighbor Fund-Spirit Lake?

    Find your warmest path to Good Neighbor Fund-Spirit Lake through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Good Neighbor Fund-Spirit Lake’s filings →

    More from the funding graph