Skip to content
Goldsteen-Cohodes Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Goldsteen-Cohodes Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$89kHousing & Shelter$85kReligion$32kHuman Services$14kEducation$13kSocial Science$10kArts & Culture$6kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $76k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$429k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HOUSING PROGRAMMING$43,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES$20,500
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$12,500
BETH TIKVAH$7,308
MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
DMAS$1,025
JINGLE ELVES$500
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF NAPLES$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MPLS FEDERATION FOR JEWISH SERVICE: $5k → 11%DOWN'S SYNDROME ASSOC OF MN: $500 → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES: $20k → 10%CHABAD JEWISH LEARNING SOCIETY: $500 → 14%DMAS: $1k → 22%JOHNS HOPKINGS BERMAN INSTITUTE OF: $5k → 19%MPLS FEDERATION FOR JEWISH SERVICE: $5k → 11%BETH TIKVAH: $7k → 10%JOHNS HOPKINGS BERMAN INSTITUTE OF: $5k → 19%SHA'ARIM BENEFIT: $3k → 11%BETH TIKVAH: $7k → 10%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $13k → 19%SHA'ARIM BENEFIT: $3k → 11%BETH TIKVAH: $4k → 10%SHA'ARIM BENEFIT: $3k → 11%BETH TIKVAH: $3k → 10%SHA'ARIM BENEFIT: $3k → 11%BETH TIKVAH: $3k → 10%ADATH JESHURUN: $2k → 11%BETH TIKVAH: $2k → 10%SHA'ARIM BENEFIT: $2k → 11%NAPLES JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL: $2k → 10%ADATH JESHURUN: $1k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES: $21k → 10%ADATH JESHURUN: $518 → 11%NAPLES JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL: $2k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES: $15k → 10%BOOKS FOR AFRICA: $1k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES: $716 → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES: $6k → 10%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 11%JINGLE ELVES: $500 → 10%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 11%JINGLE ELVES: $500 → 10%MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 11%HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF SW FL: $700 → 10%HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF NAPLES: $400 → 10%NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN: $145 → 10%JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 11%JEWISH HOUSING PROGRAMMING: $43k → 11%JEWISH HOUSING PROGRAMMING: $36k → 11%JEWISH HOUSING PROGRAMMING: $5k → 11%JEWISH HOUSING PROGRAMMING: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
CA
CO
VA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 10 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +167% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$167k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+167%
+34%

Still filing today

20%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementFood & NutritionInternationalEnvironmentAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HOUSING PROGRAMMING
    5× · 2021–2025 · $85k
  • BT
    BETH TIKVAH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $27k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k

Funded once

  • BF
    BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -23%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF SW FL
    one grant, 2020 · $700
  • CJ
    CHABAD JEWISH LEARNING SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
The Jewish Federation of Sarasota-Manatee Inc

To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.

Philanthropy
3
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
4
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
5
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
6
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
7
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
8
The Jewish Pavilion of Central Florida Inc

The jewish connection for elder-care residents. enhancing lives in senior-living communities through friendly visits, holiday celebrations and engaging programs. bringing smiles to residents of all faiths.

Human Services
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
11
Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix

Serving and supporting a vibrant, enduring jewish community.

Philanthropy
12
The Jewish Publication Society

Our mission has always been to enhance jewish literacy through the publication of great books.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH HOUSING PROGRAMMING: $85,018 · OtherJEWISH HOUSING PROGRAMMINGJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $62,438 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INCBETH TIKVAH: $27,197 · OtherBETH TIKVAHJEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $13,878 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINGS BERMAN INSTITUTE OF: $10,000 · OtherMPLS FEDERATION FOR JEWISH SERVICE: $10,000 · Other+18 more: $11,317 · OtherMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $15,018 · PhilanthropyJINGLED ELVES INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · EducationBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $1,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $54 · InternationalNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $255 · EnvironmentGFWC NAPLES WOMAN'S CLUB INC: $125 · Community ImprovementNAPLES ZOO INC: $124 · Animals
Other$231,848Philanthropy$16,018Education$12,500International$1,054Environment$255Community Improvement$125Animals$124

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $62,438 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $15,018 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJINGLED ELVES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $255 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGFWC NAPLES WOMAN'S CLUB INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $124 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $54 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOLOM HOME WEST INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JINGLED ELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GFWC NAPLES WOMAN'S CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOLOM HOME WEST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis Found…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Minneapolis FoundationMN13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goldsteen-Cohodes Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goldsteen-Cohodes Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goldsteen-Cohodes Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home