Skip to content
Goldman Family Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

Goldman Family Foundation

To raise funds for charitable, educational and religious purposes in support of the jewish federation of the lehigh valley and its mission.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Goldman Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of The Lehigh Valley, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
2
’18
2
’19
1
’20
2
’21
2
’22
3
’23
3
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$192kPhilanthropy$175kEducation$24kRecreation & Sports$21kHuman Services$12k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$68,525
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LEHIGH VALLEY$68,525
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $6k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$178k · 4 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +582% since the first grant, against +208% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$178k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+582%
+208%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Public Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VALLEY CHABAD INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $107k
  • PC
    PINEMERE CAMP ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2019–2023 · $39k · revenue +582%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH OR
    3× · 2017–2019 · $21k

Funded once

  • MS
    MAKE SCHOOLS SAFE INC DBA MAKE OUR SCHOOLS SAFEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $24k · revenue +208%
  • AS
    ARSENAL SOCCER OF NJ A NON PROFIT CORP
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue -68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALLEY CHABAD INC: $106,690 · OtherVALLEY CHABAD INCPINEMERE CAMP ASSOCIATION: $38,950 · OtherPINEMERE CAMP ASSOCIATIONCONGREGATION BETH OR: $20,615 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ORCHABAD AT TULANE: $17,440 · OtherCHABAD AT TULANEHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $8,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $175,005 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEYMAKE SCHOOLS SAFE INC DBA MAKE OUR SCHOOLS SAFE: $23,813 · Public Safety & DisasterARSENAL SOCCER OF NJ A NON PROFIT CORP: $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $12,000 · Human Services
Other$191,695Philanthropy$175,005Public Safety & Disaster$23,813Youth Development$21,000Human Services$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $175,005 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetPINEMERE CAMP ASSOCIATION: $38,950 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetARSENAL SOCCER OF NJ A NON PROFIT CORP: $21,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goldman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goldman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Goldman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Goldman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Goldman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home