Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Goldberg Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$825k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$5.5MHealth$5.4MPublic Benefit$1.2MYouth Development$255kScience & Tech$248kPhilanthropy$100kCivil Rights$63kArts & Culture$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $785k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.1M
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL$825,000
V FOUNDATION$500,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$400,000
THE BARACK H OBAMA FOUNDATION$400,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$200,000
THE CANARY FUND$125,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$125,000
CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION$85,000
AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$50,000
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA$50,000
SQUASH ON TRACK$50,000
DC ENGLISH LANGUAGE CHARTER$50,000
EATLEARNPLAY FOUNDATION$50,000
FEMINIST MAJORITY$25,000
SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 31% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD: $173k → 8%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $170k → 16%CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $825k → 7%CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $513k → 8%EATLEARNPLAY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%BRCA FOUNDATION: $500k → 10%ART OF PROBLEM SOLVING FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $125k → 17%AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $400k → 11%V FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 8%PANORAMA GLOBAL: $50k → 9%THE BARACK H OBAMA FOUNDATION: $419k → 9%SCRATCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $700k → 7%CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $460k → 8%EATLEARNPLAY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $125k → 17%DC ENGLISH LANGUAGE CHARTER: $50k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $250k → 11%V FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 8%THE BARACK H OBAMA FOUNDATION: $400k → 9%SCRATCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $250k → 7%CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $170k → 8%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $105k → 17%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $250k → 11%V FOUNDATION: $600k → 8%THE BARACK H OBAMA FOUNDATION: $333k → 9%SCRATCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $125k → 7%CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $85k → 8%SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $25k → 17%V FOUNDATION: $500k → 8%CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $100k → 7%CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $85k → 8%SQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $25k → 17%V FOUNDATION: $300k → 8%CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $50k → 7%FEMINIST MAJORITY: $25k → 14%V FOUNDATION: $250k → 8%THE CANARY FUND: $375k → 7%FEMINIST MAJORITY: $25k → 14%THE CANARY FUND: $125k → 7%SQUASH ON TRACK: $50k → 7%SQUASH ON TRACK: $50k → 7%SQUASH ON TRACK: $50k → 7%WOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
CA
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Goldberg Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 47% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 43% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Goldberg Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 18 repeat orgs$880k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$11M
$780k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+20%

Still filing today

83%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE V FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $3.7M · revenue +84%
  • CS
    CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +56%
  • CS
    CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • BF
    BRCA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue 0%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $170k · revenue 0%
  • PG
    PANORAMA GLOBALgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
3
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

7
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

10
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
11
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The V Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Youth Development CentersGovernment Accountability R…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%19%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%40%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL — $2,050,000 · EducationCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOLCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $1,313,246 · EducationCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATIONWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $900,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $545,784 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR U…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $499,998 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATIONNew York University — $355,000 · EducationNew York University+4 more — $403,447 · Education+4 moreTHE V FOUNDATION — $3,667,220 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATIONDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $169,593 · Health+1 more — $60,000 · HealthBARACK H OBAMA FOUNDATION — $1,152,465 · OtherBARACK H OBAMA FO…BRCA FOUNDATION — $500,000 · OtherBRCA FOUNDATIONART OF PROBLEM SOLVING FOUNDATION — $75,000 · Other+7 more — $277,500 · Other+7 moreTHE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION — $500,000 · PhilanthropyEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropySQUASH ON TRACK — $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentScratch Foundation — $75,000 · Science & TechPANORAMA GLOBAL — $50,000 · International
Education$6,067,475Health$3,896,813Other$2,004,965Philanthropy$600,000Youth Development$160,000Science & Tech$75,000International$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $3,667,220 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL — $2,050,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $1,313,246 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $900,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $545,784 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $499,998 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $355,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $173,447 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $169,593 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSQUASH ON TRACK — $150,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSQUASHDRIVE — $80,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetScratch Foundation — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFEMINIST MAJORITY — $62,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetELLISON INSTITUTE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSQUASH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWOODSIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORANGE COUNTY MUSIC AND DANCE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA19.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Goldberg Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Goldberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Goldberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph