· Private foundation
Gogo Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $166k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPTIMA FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE | $55,000 |
| UNLEASH PROSPERITY | $55,000 |
| THE BOARD OF HARVARD & MIT | $40,000 |
| JAMES MADISON INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS | $15,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $11,000 |
| ADAPT | $10,000 |
| JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC | $10,000 |
| LIBERTAS NETWORK | $10,000 |
| WEINGART CENTER ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| CAMPBELL HALL | $10,000 |
| FOUNTAIN HOUSE | $10,000 |
| TISCH MS RESEARCH CENTER OF NEW YORK INC | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
53 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $187k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UPUNLEASH PROSPERITY INC6× · 2019–2024 · $357k · revenue +222%
- ALAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL3× · 2022–2024 · $305k · revenue +8%
- PUPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $115k · revenue +222%
Funded once
- BBABY2BABYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +72%
- LSLeopold Schepp Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +37%
- EIEdChoice Incone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…
To create a nation where everyone enjoys a fair share of our collective prosperity.
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Los Angeles Retired Fire and Police Benevolent Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNLEASH PROSPERITY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE OPTIMA FOUNDATION DBA EDUCATION FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE ↗
- Who funds THE JAMES MADISON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
- Who funds TISCH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS RESEARCH CENTER OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN TRANSPARENCY ↗
- Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
- Who funds ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
- Who funds TRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG STORYTELLERS ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH CENTER ↗
- Who funds TEA PARTY PATRIOTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds TRUE THE VOTE INC ↗
- Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF RUNYON CANYON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOLLAND SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Little Compton Community Center Corporation ↗
- Who funds WEINGART CENTER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Libertas Network ↗
- Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds UNITE THE WORLD WITH AFRICA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · The Dunn Foundation · Thomas W Smith Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · State Policy Network · Garvey Kansas Foundation · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · The Seminar Network Inc · The Chase Foundation of Virginia · The Searle Freedom Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gogo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cape Ann Museum Inc — 38% of income from government
- The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- Trinity College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.