Skip to content
Goggio Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Goggio Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$93kHealth$79kFood & Nutrition$68kScience & Tech$66kEducation$60kEnvironment$54kInternational$30kAnimals$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCIENCE JOURNAL FOR KIDS$10,000
CONTRA COSTA FOSTER FRIENDS$10,000
MAKE IT HOME$10,000
SCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY$10,000
GRATEFUL GATHERINGS$10,000
FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTASOLANO$5,000
FRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS$5,000
HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION$5,000
BRIGHT SPOT NETWORK$5,000
RESTORE ELIKIA$5,000
MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER$5,000
THE BERKELEY FOOD NETWORK$5,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$5,000
BRIGHTLINE DEFENSE PROJECT$5,000
COUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%MAKE IT HOME: $10k → 8%OPEN SOURCE WELLNESS: $10k → 10%SWIM WITH HEART: $1k → 14%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%HELP A MOTHER OUT: $200 → 10%MAKE IT HOME: $10k → 8%CONTRA COSTA FOSTER FRIENDS: $10k → 9%MAKE IT HOME: $10k → 8%CONTRA COSTA FOSTER FRIENDS: $10k → 9%CONTRA COSTA FOSTER FRIENDS: $10k → 9%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $10k → 10%UNCOMMON GOOD: $5k → 14%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $10k → 10%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $5k → 10%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $5k → 10%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $15k → 10%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $5k → 11%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
NY
MA
CA
UT
NE
MD
AZ
NC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Goggio Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 71% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 64%.

Goggio Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$470k · 20 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +62% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
54

Total granted

$470k
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+62%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GRATEFUL GATHERINGS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +427%
  • SJ
    SCIENCE JOURNAL FOR KIDS
    5× · 2019–2023 · $61k · revenue +59%
  • KF
    KITCHENS FOR GOOD
    6× · 2018–2023 · $57k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • OA
    OPERATION ASHA NFP
    one grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue -69%
  • IN
    IMPACT NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • HG
    HIDDEN GENIUS PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +417%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
3
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
4
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

—
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
7
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Fresh Approach

The mission of fresh approach is to create long-term change in local food systems by connecting california communities with healthy food from california farmers and expanding knowledge about food and nutrition.

Food & Nutrition
10
Color the Block

Color The Block fosters a healthier, more equitable society by providing access to creative, educational, and environmental programs. We operate with the belief that collective action, creative expression, and hands-on learning experiences…

Arts & Culture
11
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
12
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability; the most unlike its peers is Operation of Hope Worldwide. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
47/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KITCHENS FOR GOOD: $57,000 · OtherKITCHENS FOR GOODFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS: $40,000 · OtherFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTSSCIENCE JOURNAL FOR KIDS: $28,000 · OtherSCIENCE JOURNAL FOR KIDSJACARANDA HEALTH FJC: $19,980 · OtherJACARANDA HEALTH FJCOPERATION ASHA NFP: $14,240 · OtherIMPACT NETWORK: $11,700 · Other+49 more: $168,980 · Other+49 moreGRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $75,200 · Human ServicesGRATEFUL GATHERINGSMAKE IT HOME - BAY AREA: $30,000 · Human ServicesMAKE IT HOME - BAY AREACONTRA COSTA FOSTER FRIENDS: $30,000 · Human ServicesCONTRA COSTA FOSTER FRIEN…OPEN SOURCE WELLNESS: $10,000 · Human ServicesOPEN SOURCE WELLNESS+5 more: $18,700 · Human Services+5 moreSCIENCE JOURNAL FOR KIDS: $60,500 · Science & TechSCIENCE JOURN…RAINFOREST CONNECTION: $25,000 · Science & TechRAINFOREST CO…SCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC: $30,000 · EducationHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $11,400 · EducationCommunity Resources for Science: $4,000 · Education+3 more: $2,250 · EducationOMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $28,470 · AnimalsTHE ADVENTURE PROJECT CORP: $10,000 · InternationalOPERATION OF HOPE WORLDWIDE: $7,500 · InternationalRESTORE ELIKIA INC: $5,000 · InternationalCureCervicalCancer: $2,500 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $2,500 · InternationalJACARANDA HEALTH: $10,000 · HealthMY HEALTH ED INC: $5,000 · HealthBright Spot Network: $5,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 · HealthLincoln: $1,000 · Health
Other$339,900Human Services$163,900Science & Tech$85,500Education$47,650Animals$28,470International$27,500Health$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $75,200 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetSCIENCE JOURNAL FOR KIDS: $60,500 over 5y, 20% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $57,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS: $40,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMAKE IT HOME - BAY AREA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCONTRA COSTA FOSTER FRIENDS: $30,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetOMAHA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $28,470 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST CONNECTION: $25,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetOPERATION ASHA NFP: $14,240 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $11,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCE: $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJACARANDA HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADVENTURE PROJECT CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOPEN SOURCE WELLNESS: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetBerkeley Food Network: $8,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOPERATION OF HOPE WORLDWIDE: $7,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE SEEDSSOUTHWESTERN ENDANGERED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIntersection for the Arts: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMY HEALTH ED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBright Spot Network: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELP A MOTHER OUT: $2,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLAY MARIN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCureCervicalCancer: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT WILDLANDS CONSERVANCY: $2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetEnvironmental Health Coalition: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth East Trees Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWIM WITH HEART: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLincoln: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT JUSTICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Oakland REACH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe College of Idaho Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDO SOMETHING INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The San Francisco Fou…The William & Flora H…Marin Community Found…The California Wellne…Jewish Community Fede…Tides FoundationEast Bay Community Fo…Clif Family FoundationMcNabb FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…The California Endowm…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA23.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Tides Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The California Endowment

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goggio Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goggio Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goggio Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home