Skip to content

· Private foundation

Goetz Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$263k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.2MReligion$335kHuman Services$171kArts & Culture$112kHealth$87kPublic Safety & Disaster$51kCivil Rights$15kEmployment$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$60,000
Individual grant recipient$42,500
ST LUCY CHURCH$40,000
ST PATRICK'S MISSIONARY$25,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO$20,000
LIVE ACTION$15,000
INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP INC$10,000
MISERICORDIA HOME$10,000
DELBARTON SCHOOL$10,000
ELDER HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
ONE FOR ONE CHICAGO$6,500
FAITH HOPE AND CHARITY$5,000
LOYOLA ACADEMY$5,000
HFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS$2,500
AMERICAN LEGION$1,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OUTREACH TEEN & FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 11%CHARITABLE ADULT RIDES & SERVICES OPERATING: $100k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $20k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $10k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 20 repeat orgs$323k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
22

Total granted

$1.7M
$247k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+27%

Still filing today

40%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthReligionArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Dayton
    8× · 2017–2024 · $450k · revenue +38%
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $205k · revenue +50%
  • HC
    HFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHARITABLE ADULT RIDES & SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +19%
  • CH
    CANCER HOPE NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +207%
  • SC
    SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF NW SUBURBS
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
4
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
7
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
8
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Hope Network; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LUCY CHURCH: $269,500 · OtherST LUCY CHURCHFAITH HOPE AND CHARITY SCHOOLS: $172,500 · OtherFAITH HOPE AND CHARITY SCHOOLSLOYOLA ACADEMY: $105,000 · OtherLOYOLA ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $72,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $51,000 · OtherDELBARTON SCHOOL: $40,000 · OtherST BENEDICT PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $33,000 · Other+25 more: $239,100 · Other+25 moreUniversity of Dayton: $450,000 · EducationUniversity of DaytonVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $205,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYHFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $65,000 · EducationHFS CHICAGO SCHOLARSMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · Education+2 more: $20,000 · EducationCHARITABLE ADULT RIDES & SERVICES: $100,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOME: $40,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $43,500 · Arts & CultureMARY'S CHILDREN FAMILY CENTER OF MI: $10,000 · ReligionInternational Friendships Inc: $10,000 · ReligionBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $7,500 · HealthLIVE ACTION: $15,000 · Civil Rights
Other$982,100Education$780,000Human Services$151,000Arts & Culture$43,500Religion$20,000Health$17,500Civil Rights$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Dayton: $450,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $205,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITABLE ADULT RIDES & SERVICES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS: $65,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $43,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER HOPE NETWORK: $20,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetMOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE FOR ONE CHICAGO: $11,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Legion: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOutreach Teen and Family Services Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE ADULT RIDES & SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds CANCER HOPE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds ONE FOR ONE CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S CHILDREN FAMILY CENTER OF MI ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds International Friendships Inc ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goetz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goetz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goetz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph