Skip to content
Gloria and Richard Kushel Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gloria and Richard Kushel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$563k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$7.1MPhilanthropy$399kHuman Services$226kHealth$134kReligion$112kRecreation & Sports$37kCommunity Improvement$25kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $449k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$35k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYU Langone Health$100,965
Stem Alliance of Larchmont-Mamaroneck Inc$100,964
Larchmont Temple Inc$99,503
San Francisco 49ers Foundation$75,066
University of Calgary$72,963
Old Bill's Fun Run$35,853
Stem Alliance of Larchmont-Mamaroneck Inc$34,100
Project Healthy Minds$10,000
Mamaroneck - Larchmont Student Aid Fund$10,000
Hope & Heroes$10,000
Larchmont Temple Inc$5,000
National Homeless Law Center$3,500
Slow Food in the Tetons$2,500
Lovell Historical Society$2,000
Boys & Girls Club of Mount Vernon$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $226k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%San Francisco 49ers Foundation: $75k → 8%San Francisco 49ers Foundation: $75k → 8%San Francisco 49ers Foundation: $68k → 8%San Francisco 49ers Foundation: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 13 repeat orgs$324k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$1.6M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+7%

Still filing today

77%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    STEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +55%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $226k · revenue +26%
  • SF
    SLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • CF
    Community Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
  • CR
    Community Resource Center
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Mount Vernon Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mamaroneck Emergency Medical Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,731,458 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY+3 more: $92,100 · EducationSTEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC: $1,178,895 · Youth DevelopmentSTEM ALLIANCE OF…+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentLARCHMONT TEMPLE INC: $111,503 · OtherNYU Langone Health: $100,965 · OtherUniversity of Calgary: $72,963 · OtherCommunity Foundation: $36,360 · OtherOld Bill's Fun Run: $35,853 · OtherCommunity Resource Center: $25,000 · Other+13 more: $24,250 · OtherNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $253,364 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $106,143 · Philanthropy+2 more: $6,100 · PhilanthropySAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION: $225,842 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $6,250 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,500 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,000 · HealthMEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE: $1,000 · HealthPROJECT HEALTHY MINDS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$5,823,558Youth Development$1,179,395Other$406,894Philanthropy$365,607Human Services$227,842Health$21,750Arts & Culture$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,731,458 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC: $1,178,895 over 5y, 20% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $253,364 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION: $225,842 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $106,143 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND: $90,150 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetHOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $6,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLarchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER GOLF ASSOCIATION CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA LEG TO STAND ON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER LOVELL LAND TRUST INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMamaroneck Emergency Medical Service Inc: $400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKEZAR LAKE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Glff IncJewish Communal FundThe Goldman Sachs Cha…The Toby and Nataly R…Stephen & Tabitha Kin…Jewish Community Fede…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Ayco Charitable F…Baird Foundation IncThe Pfizer Foundation…Silicon Valley Commun…
Glff IncNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Glff Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Toby and Nataly Ritter Family Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gloria and Richard Kushel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gloria and Richard Kushel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gloria and Richard Kushel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home