· Private foundation
Gloria and Richard Kushel Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $449k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NYU Langone Health | $100,965 |
| Stem Alliance of Larchmont-Mamaroneck Inc | $100,964 |
| Larchmont Temple Inc | $99,503 |
| San Francisco 49ers Foundation | $75,066 |
| University of Calgary | $72,963 |
| Old Bill's Fun Run | $35,853 |
| Stem Alliance of Larchmont-Mamaroneck Inc | $34,100 |
| Project Healthy Minds | $10,000 |
| Mamaroneck - Larchmont Student Aid Fund | $10,000 |
| Hope & Heroes | $10,000 |
| Larchmont Temple Inc | $5,000 |
| National Homeless Law Center | $3,500 |
| Slow Food in the Tetons | $2,500 |
| Lovell Historical Society | $2,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Mount Vernon | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $226k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASTEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC5× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +55%
- SFSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $226k · revenue +26%
- SFSLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS INC2× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- CFCommunity Foundationone grant, 2021 · $36k
- CRCommunity Resource Centerone grant, 2021 · $25k
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Mount Vernon Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mamaroneck Emergency Medical Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds STEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds MAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND ↗
- Who funds HOPE & HEROES CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HEALTHY MINDS ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds SLOW FOOD IN THE TETONS INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Larchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc ↗
- Who funds LOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER GOLF ASSOCIATION CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL STUDENTS FOR CHOICE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GROS VENTRE FIRE STATION ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE HOBBS MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds GREATER LOVELL LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC ↗
- Who funds A LEG TO STAND ON INC ↗
- Who funds Mamaroneck Emergency Medical Service Inc ↗
- Who funds KEZAR LAKE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Glff Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Toby and Nataly Ritter Family Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gloria and Richard Kushel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.