Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Global Whole Being Fund

Form 990 part iii, line 1- gwbf is dedicated to improving the well-being of people displaced by war, persecution, natural disasters, and climate change, including refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced people (people on the move).

$9.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$5.7M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

International$9.6MCrime & Legal$562kHuman Services$320kCivil Rights$75kPhilanthropy$35kArts & Culture$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$15k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $6,672,045 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,260,045 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,588,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
  • $250k+2 grants · $6.3M
$40,020
Median grant
7
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHOOSE LOVE INC$5,720,235
AL OTRO LADO INC$561,790
ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT$150,000
ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STAT$75,000
INSTITUTE OF CHIN AFFAIRS$50,000
COLORS RAINBOW$40,020
PLAN PAIS INC$20,000
ROHINGYA WOMEN DEVELOPMENT NETWORK$15,000
COALICION POR VENEZUELA$15,000
THE WHITE HELMETS INC$15,000
WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $10.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AL OTRO LADO INC: $562k → 14%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $5.7M → 17%National Partnership for New Americans Inc: $20k → 14%Choose Love Inc: $3.7M → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS: $10k → 17%Women Moving Millions: $10k → 17%Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project Inc: $150k → 17%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $150k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
CA
VA
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $2.6M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$705k · 27% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$528k · 20% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT

Sub-Saharan Africa$510k · 20% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$390k · 15% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT

South America$330k · 13% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT

Central America and the Caribbean$120k · 5% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM GRANT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.8M · 3 repeat orgs$872k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$9.8M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-34%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $792k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CHOOSE LOVE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $9.4M · revenue -34% · 55% of their budget
  • AS
    ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue -19%
  • WM
    WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue -44%

Funded once

  • Solidaire Network Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +240%
  • A
    ARTogether
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • NP
    NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women in Migration Network Inc

Women in Migration Network (WIMN), an international non-governmental organization, identifies and promotes human rights-based and feminist global migration policies. We lift up and support the experiences, voices and agency of all women in…

Civil Rights
2
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
3
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
4
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
5
Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans

We advocate for the full economic, social, and civic inclusion of refugees and displaced populations in the San Diego region, throughout California, and across the country.

Human Services
6
Partnership for Participatory International Policy

Partnership for Participatory International Policy coordinates opportunities for elected officials, staff and community leaders to learn from people impacted by US foreign policies and practices. We do this by organizing delegations to…

Civil Rights
7
Capi Usa

CAPI USA's mission is to guide refugees and immigrants in the journey toward self-determination and social equality.

International
8
International Refugee Assistance Project Inc

Irap is a global legal aid and advocacy organization working to create a world where refugees and all people seeking safety are empowered to claim their right to freedom of movement and a path to lasting refuge. everyone should have a safe…

Human Services
9
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services
10
Pangea Legal Services

Pangea's mission is to provide deportation defense services, advocate for policy change, and provide education and legal empowerment for our immigrant communities.

Crime & Legal
11
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
12
Advocates for Immigrant Survivors

AIS's mission is to provide immigration legal services and social services to aid survivors in accessing the rights to justice, dignity, and restoration.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Partnership for New Americans and the most unlike its peers is Al Otro Lado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
3/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHOOSE LOVE INC — $9,445,745 · Human ServicesCHOOSE LOVE INCAL OTRO LADO — $561,790 · Human ServicesAL OTRO LADO+3 more — $340,000 · Human ServicesATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC — $75,000 · InternationalTHE WHITE HELMETS INC — $15,000 · InternationalColors Rainbow Inc — $40,020 · EducationPLAN PAIS INC — $20,000 · EducationINSTITUTE OF CHIN AFFAIRS — $50,000 · Public BenefitSolidaire Network Inc — $35,000 · PhilanthropyARTogether — $25,000 · Arts & CultureCoalicion por Venezuela Inc — $15,000 · Civil RightsROHINGYA WOMEN DEVELOPMENT NETWORK — $15,000 · Other
Human Services$10,347,535International$90,000Education$60,020Public Benefit$50,000Philanthropy$35,000Arts & Culture$25,000Civil Rights$15,000Other$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHOOSE LOVE INC — $9,445,745 over 2y, 55% of budgetAL OTRO LADO — $561,790 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC — $300,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE OF CHIN AFFAIRS — $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetColors Rainbow Inc — $40,020 over 1y, 14% of budgetSolidaire Network Inc — $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARTogether — $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPLAN PAIS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WHITE HELMETS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCoalicion por Venezuela Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Global Whole Being Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Global Whole Being Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Global Whole Being Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph