Skip to content
Global Service Network Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Global Service Network Inc

Empowering servants of christ to take the gospel to the world.

$795k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.3MCommunity Improvement$153kInternational$94kYouth Development$48kHuman Services$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $227,004, the rows itemized in this filing. The $795,078 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $568,074 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $172k
$10,900
Median grant
11
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANKLIN FELLOWS$47,500
REDEEMER COMMUNITY CHURCH$36,200
THRIVE ADVENTURES$30,244
THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF OTHELLO$18,800
CHESTERFIELD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$17,300
FILTER OF HOPE$11,195
VITURMIS$10,900
7 BILLION REASONS INC$9,820
PCA MISSION TO NORTH AMERICA$8,400
CRU$8,200
LAUNCH MINISTRIES$8,000
COLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$7,125
THE SHEPHERD'S CHURCH$6,920
AXIA INTERNATIONAL$6,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GIVING BACK LIFE: $26k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
IL
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $534k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$396k · 74% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: BLIND MINISTRY · CHURCH MINISTRY · SPORTS MINISTRY

South Asia$67k · 13% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: CHURCH MINISTRY

East Asia and the Pacific$63k · 12% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: CHURCH MINISTRY · RADIO & MEDIA MINISTRY

Sub-Saharan Africa$8k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MINISTRY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of Global Service Network Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Global Service Network Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$978k · 13 repeat orgs$481k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +114% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
23

Total granted

$978k
$349k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%
+44%

Still filing today

31%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THRIVE ADVENTURES
    4× · 2020–2024 · $88k · revenue +114%
  • FO
    FILTER OF HOPE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +141%
  • 7B
    7 Billion Reasons Inc
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • BS
    BAPTIST STUDENT UNION
    one grant, 2022 · $38k
  • MP
    MENTORING PARTNERS
    one grant, 2023 · $36k
  • SG
    SERGE GLOBAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $31k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
2
Awakening Ministries International

Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.

Religion
3
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
4
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
5
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
6
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
7
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
8
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
9
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion
10
Shine in the World Ministries

Shine exists to proclaim Jesus Christ to all lost peoples around the world, to mobilize the local church to embrace the Great Commission, and to equip the present and next generation of leaders in their spiritual quest and service to God…

International
11
GlobalServant Ministries Inc

Offers counsel, formal & informal teaching served in a pastoral role, mentored groups,filled numerous speaking invitations, conducted discipling groups & provided spiritual, emotional and

Religion
12
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Launch Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is World Partners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $200,849 · OtherCHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCHCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $116,607 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCNEW LIFE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $98,400 · OtherNEW LIFE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHVITURAMIS: $91,837 · OtherVITURAMISCALVARY CHAPEL WORSHIP CENTER INC: $58,596 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL WORSHIP CENTER INCRESTORATION COMMUNITY CHURCH: $44,332 · OtherCHESTERFIELD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $41,300 · OtherBAPTIST STUDENT UNION: $38,051 · OtherREDEEMER COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $36,200 · Other+19 more: $292,344 · Other+19 moreWorld Partners: $152,566 · InternationalWorld Partner…7 Billion Reasons Inc: $14,820 · International7 Billion Rea…INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $9,957 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL…+1 more: $6,000 · InternationalTHRIVE ADVENTURES: $88,468 · ReligionHARVEST AVIATION INC: $13,904 · Religion2REMAIN1 MINISTRIES: $6,300 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,160 · ReligionThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $88,337 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $13,820 · PhilanthropyAxia International: $6,400 · PhilanthropyFRANKLIN FELLOWS: $47,500 · Youth DevelopmentMENTORING PARTNERS: $35,575 · Youth DevelopmentLAUNCH MINISTRIES INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIVING BACK LIFE INC: $25,534 · Human ServicesWings of the Way Inc: $7,300 · Human ServicesHOPE HUB XENIA: $12,524 · Health
Other$1,018,516International$183,343Religion$113,832Philanthropy$108,557Youth Development$91,075Human Services$32,834Health$12,524

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorld Partners: $152,566 over 2y, 30% of budgetTHRIVE ADVENTURES: $88,468 over 4y, 10% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $88,337 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRANKLIN FELLOWS: $47,500 over 1y, 27% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC: $30,884 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIVING BACK LIFE INC: $25,534 over 1y, 14% of budgetFILTER OF HOPE INC: $25,161 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING TRUTH INC: $16,116 over 1y, 7.0% of budget7 Billion Reasons Inc: $14,820 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetHARVEST AVIATION INC: $13,904 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $13,820 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HUB XENIA: $12,524 over 1y, 16% of budgetAMF INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $9,957 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAUNCH MINISTRIES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWings of the Way Inc: $7,300 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetAxia International: $6,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,160 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds World Partners ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE ADVENTURES ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN FELLOWS ↗
  • Who funds MENTORING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVING BACK LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds FILTER OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING TRUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds 7 Billion Reasons Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST AVIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HUB XENIA ↗
  • Who funds AMF INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds LAUNCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Wings of the Way Inc ↗
  • Who funds Axia International ↗
  • Who funds 2REMAIN1 MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationChristian Community F…Natl Christian Charit…The US Charitable Gif…Renaissance Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…
Servant FoundationKS14.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Global Service Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Global Service Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Global Service Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home