Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Global Impact Social Welfare Fund

Global Impact Social Welfare Fund, inc.

$47M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$7.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.

Civil Rights$37MPublic Benefit$18MEnvironment$8.9MHealth$5.0MEducation$2.8MCrime & Legal$2.1MHuman Services$1.9MScience & Tech$1.9MOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 55 grants below total $43,281,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $47,114,627 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,833,627 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+37 grants · $41M
$420,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Floridians Protecting Freedom Inc$7,250,000
Contours Inc$6,620,000
MONTANANS SECURING REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$2,370,000
Black Progressive Action Coalition$2,200,000
Strategic Victory Fund$1,920,000
Alliance for Youth Action$1,750,000
Justice Project$1,100,000
ENGINEERING IMPACT FUND INC$1,000,000
Nextgen Climate Action$1,000,000
CFFE PAC$1,000,000
Good Neighbor Fund$1,000,000
Future Now Action$1,000,000
Alliance for Gun Responsibility$1,000,000
Retire Career Politicians Inc$935,000
Americans for Contraception$850,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Choose Love Inc: $312k → 17%Reproductive Freedom for All: $850k → 14%Reproductive Freedom for All: $750k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
DE
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$32M · 18 repeat orgs$46M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
41

Total granted

$32M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

83%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Civil RightsHealthPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WESTERN FUTURES FUND INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +168% · 61% of their budget
  • LJ
    LOCAL JOBS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +356%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • UU
    Upstream USA Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $2.5M · revenue 0%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2024 · $1.7M
  • OU
    Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights
    one grant, 2024 · $1.5M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fdd Action

FDD Action is a non-profit, non-partisan 504(c)4 organization established to advocate for effective policies to promote U.S. National Security and defend free nations.

Community Improvement
2
Democracy Forward

See schedule o.this organization seeks to build collective power to defend and advance a vibrant democracy that benefits all people.

—
3
Foreign Policy for America

Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.

—
4
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
5
Register America

The organization is founded for social welfare purposes, including assisting with voter registration and advocating for policies which lead to increased voter registration in the united states.

—
6
Democracy Works Inc

The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.

Civil Rights
7
Fair Democracy

Fair democracy works to ensure that the roots of american democracy are healthy with strong voting rights and access, an engaged and informed electorate, an open and accountable government and trusted messengers engaging americans in civil…

Civil Rights
8
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
9
Center for Popular Democracy Inc

The center for popular democracy (cpd) and its affiliates know that everyday people have the power to change the world. we upend business and politics as usual to forge a representative, multiracial government and society where we all…

Public Benefit
10
RepresentUs

RepresentUs is America's leading nonpartisan grassroots organization working for a government accountable to the people. We unite people from all backgrounds to defend democracy, root out corruption, mobilize action, and support campaigns…

Public Benefit
11
Act for America

Advocacy concerning democratic values, national security and defense; lobbying of government officials in favor of policies that further the defense of the u.s. and its constitution; development of coalitions with other organizations to…

Civil Rights
12
Voteamerica

The mission of voteamerica is to strengthen united states democracy by increasing voter turnout.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Run for Something Action Fund and the most unlike its peers is Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Land Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Fallen First Responder Supp…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 9 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%24%<5yr14%28%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%36%<5yr14%26%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 24% of your grantees by number, and just 36% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%1/103
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,462

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/76
Grantees still filing
25/76
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM — $7,250,000 · OtherFLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOMCONTOURS INC — $6,620,000 · OtherCONTOURS INCSTRATEGIC VICTORY FUND — $5,370,000 · OtherSTRATEGIC VICTORY FUNDNEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION — $3,050,000 · OtherMONTANANS SECURING REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS — $2,620,000 · OtherAMERICANS FOR CONTRACEPTION — $2,450,000 · OtherBLACK PROGRESSIVE ACTION COALITION — $2,200,000 · OtherTHE PAC FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE — $2,100,000 · Other+63 more — $26,433,495 · Other+63 moreALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ACTION — $2,250,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FO…ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $1,300,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FO…POLICING EQUITY — $1,000,000 · Civil RightsPOLICING EQ…FORWARD ACTION FUND — $750,000 · Civil RightsFORWARD ACT…PA ALLIANCE ACTION — $540,000 · Civil RightsPA ALLIANCE…CLEAN SLATE INITIATIVE INC — $500,000 · Civil RightsCLEAN SLATE…RESPONSIVE GOV ACTION INC — $475,000 · Civil RightsRESPONSIVE …FORWARD MT — $400,000 · Civil Rights+7 more — $915,000 · Civil Rights+7 moreNORTH FUND — $1,650,000 · Public BenefitFUTURE NOW ACTION — $1,650,000 · Public BenefitGOOD NEIGHBOR FUND — $1,000,000 · Public BenefitGlobal Impact Social Welfare Fund — $523,000 · Public BenefitRUN FOR SOMETHING ACTION FUND — $200,000 · Public Benefit+1 more — $100,000 · Public BenefitUpstream USA Inc — $2,499,999 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC — $1,150,000 · HealthSUPPORTING INITIATIVES TO REDISTRIBUTE UNUSED MEDICINE - SIRUM — $800,000 · HealthCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE EDUCATION FUND — $250,000 · Health+1 more — $66,700 · HealthWESTERN FUTURES FUND INC — $3,000,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $60,000 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE FOR GUN RESPONSIBILITY — $2,250,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND — $1,775,000 · EnvironmentGREENLIGHT ACTION — $250,000 · EnvironmentThe Partnership Project Action Fund — $200,000 · Environment
Other$58,093,495Civil Rights$8,130,000Public Benefit$5,123,000Health$4,766,699Philanthropy$3,060,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,250,000Environment$2,225,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTRATEGIC VICTORY FUND — $5,370,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetNEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION — $3,050,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetWESTERN FUTURES FUND INC — $3,000,000 over 2y, 61% of budgetMONTANANS SECURING REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS — $2,620,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUpstream USA Inc — $2,499,999 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetAMERICANS FOR CONTRACEPTION — $2,450,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ACTION — $2,250,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR GUN RESPONSIBILITY — $2,250,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetBLACK PROGRESSIVE ACTION COALITION — $2,200,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND — $1,775,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOCAL JOBS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND INC — $1,750,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetNORTH FUND — $1,650,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetFUTURE NOW ACTION — $1,650,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL — $1,600,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $1,300,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetMissourians for Constitutional Freedom — $1,250,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC — $1,150,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR FUND — $1,000,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetPOLICING EQUITY — $1,000,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $900,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUPPORTING INITIATIVES TO REDISTRIBUTE UNUSED MEDICINE - SIRUM — $800,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetOUR AMERICAN FUTURE ACTION — $750,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetGlobal Impact — $750,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSUPERMAJORITY — $700,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetFIRST FIVE ACTION FUND — $600,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetPA ALLIANCE ACTION — $540,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $526,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact Social Welfare Fund — $523,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY — $500,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPROTECT OUR FAMILIES INC — $500,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetFORWARD MT — $400,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCHOOSE LOVE INC — $312,328 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetONE FOR DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND — $275,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE EQUITY NOW INC — $250,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetSHERIFF ACCOUNTABILITY ACTION — $250,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE EDUCATION FUND — $250,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetRoad to Michigan's Future — $200,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetRUN FOR SOMETHING ACTION FUND — $200,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetNEVADA ALLIANCE — $200,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCITIZENS FOR A SAFER MINNESOTA — $200,000 over 2y, 73% of budgetThe Partnership Project Action Fund — $200,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSTATE DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS ACTION D/B/A DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS ACTION — $150,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMONTANA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP — $150,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetThe Voter Project — $150,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFWDUS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDEMOCRACY DEFENSE PROJECT INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICA WORKS USA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundOpen Society Action F…Our American Future A…Way to Win Action Fun…America VotesNorth FundTides AdvocacyHopewell FundAdvocacy Action Fund …Tides FoundationAll Hands on Deck Net…Future Forward USA Ac…
Sixteen Thirty FundDC86.4× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Our American Future Action · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · America Votes · North Fund · Tides Advocacy · Hopewell Fund · Advocacy Action Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Future Forward USA Action

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Global Impact Social Welfare Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Global Impact Social Welfare Fund?

Find your warmest path to Global Impact Social Welfare Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines