Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Global Evangelical Missions Society

A charitable organization assisting Christian missionary and evangelism efforts

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Religion$3.8MFood & Nutrition$241kInternational$155kEducation$110k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $912,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,246,300 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $334,300 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $293k
  • $250k+1 grant · $550k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EFCA Foundation$550,000
FEBC$110,000
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School$100,000
Food for the Poor$83,000
Global Humanitarian Mission$20,000
Cross International$19,000
Central Baptist Church$16,000
Christ Studio$7,000
Barnabas Resources$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Global Humanitarian Mission: $20k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $265k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $75k to organizations and $190k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$190k · 72% · 2 people

Stated purpose: Missionary work in Ukraine

East Asia and the Pacific$75k · 28% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Seminary support · Christian ministry

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Global Evangelical Missions Society’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 36% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 28% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Global Evangelical Missions Societylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.1M · 9 repeat orgs$189k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$4.1M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+8%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FE
    FAR EAST BROADCASTING COMPANY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +88%
  • CI
    Cross International Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $116k · revenue +31%
  • BF
    BIBLICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR FREEDOM INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $22k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • EC
    EDGE CITY CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $24k
  • IF
    INSIGHT FOR LIVING
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +8%
  • WC
    WORLDWIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gospel Operation International for Chinese Christians

Our mission is to accomplish the Great Commission through the use of resources of Chinese churches worldwide in mission education, recruitment, training, missionary sending, and all other effective means in collaboration with the Global…

Religion
2
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
3
Asia Harvest Inc

To help spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ by providing resources and financial support to projects throughout Asia

International
4
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
5
China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

6
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
7
Kingdom of God Ministry

We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.

8
Global Outreach Mission Inc

Global Outreach Mission, Inc. is an inter-denominational foreign and domestic ministry organization that is engaged in a wide variety of ministries, including church planting, Christian camps, personal work, literature, community…

Religion
9
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
10
Go With God Global

The organizations mission is enhancing the legal distribution of free bibles and equipping and discipling pastors and trainers to use the word of god effectively.

Religion
11
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
12
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cross International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Barnabas Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA — $2,025,000 · OtherTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICATHE SALVATION ARMY — $113,000 · Other+5 more — $128,000 · Other+5 moreFAR EAST BROADCASTING COMPANY — $1,211,050 · ReligionFAR EAST BROADCASTING COMPANYGOSPEL OPERATION INTERNATIONAL (USA) — $170,000 · ReligionGOSPEL OPERATION INTERNATIONAL (USA)Cross International Inc — $116,000 · ReligionCross International Inc+4 more — $50,000 · ReligionFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $349,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR …Trinity International University — $100,000 · EducationGlobal Humanitarian Mission Inc — $20,000 · Human Services
Other$2,266,000Religion$1,547,050International$349,000Education$100,000Human Services$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAR EAST BROADCASTING COMPANY — $1,211,050 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $349,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOSPEL OPERATION INTERNATIONAL (USA) — $170,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetCross International Inc — $116,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity International University — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIBLICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR FREEDOM INC — $22,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetGlobal Humanitarian Mission Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetINSIGHT FOR LIVING — $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLDWIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBARNABAS RESOURCES — $7,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAR EAST BROADCASTING COMPANY
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
  • Who funds GOSPEL OPERATION INTERNATIONAL (USA)
  • Who funds Cross International Inc
  • Who funds Trinity International University
  • Who funds BIBLICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR FREEDOM INC
  • Who funds Global Humanitarian Mission Inc
  • Who funds INSIGHT FOR LIVING
  • Who funds WORLDWIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds BARNABAS RESOURCES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Global Evangelical Missions Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
  • Global Humanitarian Mission Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Global Evangelical Missions Society?

Find your warmest path to Global Evangelical Missions Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph