Skip to content
Glickman Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Glickman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2026still arriving
2
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$133kArts & Culture$131kReligion$19kAnimals$10kInternational$7kPhilanthropy$5kEducation$3kRecreation & Sports$500Other$0
02FY2026 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,096
Median grant
1
States reached
$69k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSP$8,096
BOCA RATON FILM FESTIVAL$786
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TZAHAL SHALOM OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER: $2k → 9%EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $1k → 11%THE AFRICAN DREAM ACADEMY: $6k → 17%SANTA FE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $200 → 12%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSP: $9k → 11%PAPANICOLAOU CORPS FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $500 → 13%ONS FOUNDATION FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $27k → 9%MIZEL ARTS & CULTURE CENTER: $25k → 12%FIT 4 ALL INC: $500 → 4%THE PUTNEY SCHOOL: $1k → 11%TZAHAL SHALOM OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER: $1k → 9%EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $997 → 11%THE AFRICAN DREAM ACADEMY: $1k → 17%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL INC: $9k → 11%ONSFONS FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%MIZEL ARTS & CULTURE CENTER: $19k → 12%TZAHAL SHALOM OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER: $600 → 9%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 17%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSP: $9k → 11%YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH: $1k → 9%JEWISH COLORADO: $10k → 12%JDRF: $31k → 9%PHOTOGRAPHY COLLECTIONS: $43k → 17%BOCA RATON HOSPITAL: $9k → 11%JEWISH COLORADO: $5k → 12%JDRF: $24k → 9%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSP: $8k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF COLORADO: $5k → 12%KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $11k → 9%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSP: $5k → 11%KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 9%BOCA RATON FILM FESTIVAL: $802 → 11%KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $1k → 9%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $1k → 9%BOCA RATON FILM FESTIVAL: $786 → 11%WJCS: $250 → 9%BOCA RATON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 9%THE PAPS CORPS: $725 → 11%KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 9%BOCA RATON FILM FESTIVAL: $500 → 11%CONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NM
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Glickman Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Glickman Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$196k · 8 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
18

Total granted

$196k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+59%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthArts & CultureInternationalCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +49%
  • MC
    MIZEL CENTER FOR ARTS AND CULTURE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $44k · revenue +53%
  • KM
    KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART
    6× · 2017–2023 · $43k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $43k
  • OF
    ONS FOUNDATION FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $27k · revenue +154%
  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
7
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
8
Institute for Applied Gerontology

The mjhs institute for innovation in palliative care is a not-for-profit organization. the institute is dedicated to promoting access to evidence-based, specialist-level palliative care for patients and families coping with serious or…

Human Services
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
11
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

Joint Commission evaluates and accredits health care organizations and programs across the United States to ensure compliance with rigorous standards of quality and safety, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $55,443 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $39,441 · HealthBoca Raton Regional Hospital IncONS FOUNDATION FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC: $26,689 · HealthONS FOUNDATION FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH AND EDU…+4 more: $2,040 · HealthMIZEL CENTER FOR ARTS AND CULTURE: $43,798 · Arts & CultureMIZEL CENTER FOR ARTS AND CULT…KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $43,068 · Arts & CultureKATONAH MUSEUM OF ARTIndividual grant recipient: $43,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…BOCA RATON HOSPITAL: $8,611 · OtherBOCA RATON HOSPITALJEWISH FEDERATION OF COLORADO: $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF COL…TZAHAL SHALOM OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER: $3,400 · Other+9 more: $8,513 · Other+9 moreJEWISHColorado: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $9,992 · Human ServicesAfrican Dream Academy Foundation Incorporated: $7,000 · InternationalBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Community ImprovementEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $2,075 · Education
Health$123,613Arts & Culture$86,866Other$68,524Philanthropy$15,000Human Services$9,992International$7,000Community Improvement$5,000Education$2,075

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $55,443 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIZEL CENTER FOR ARTS AND CULTURE: $43,798 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $43,068 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $39,441 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $9,992 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAfrican Dream Academy Foundation Incorporated: $7,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMMA WILLARD SCHOOL: $2,075 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUTNEY SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresbyterian Healthcare Foundation: $790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAPANICOLAOU CORPS FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…The Pfizer Foundation…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA12.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glickman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glickman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Glickman Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Glickman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glickman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home