Skip to content

· Private foundation

Glendorn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$236k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MArts & Culture$275kAnimals$220kEducation$184kPhilanthropy$72kScience & Tech$15kHuman Services$13k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $186k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATN-YR 23$50,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL COLO FND-YR 12$35,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO-YR 33$30,000
DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION$30,000
HOLLAND HALL$25,000
NEW MEXICO TECH-YR 22$20,000
FLICKINGER CNTR FOR PERFORMING ARTS$15,000
BRADFORD LOCAL CHARITIES (15)$10,500
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH-YR 23$10,000
DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNION AID SOCIETY: $13k → 11%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
PA
CO
AZ
NM
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 14 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$1.5M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+6%

Still filing today

43%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $181k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DZ
    DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $220k · revenue +39%
  • TM
    THE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $210k · revenue +118%
  • FC
    FLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHRYSALIS HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • SO
    SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY CENTERS
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • UA
    Union Aid Societygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Fox Chase Cancer Center Foundation

To prevail over cancer, marshaling heart and mind in bold scientific discovery, pioneering prevention and compassionate care.

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
University of Arizona Foundation

The university of arizona foundation is committed to supporting and enhancing the vision, mission and values of the university of arizona through the development and management of private support.

Education
7
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
8
The University of Montana Foundation

The university of montana foundation inspires philanthropic support to enhance excellence and opportunity at the university of montana.

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
The Rockefeller University

The rockefeller university (the university) is a world renowned center for research and graduate education in the biomedical sciences, chemistry, bioinformatics, and physics. the university's 73 laboratories conduct both clinical and basic…

Education
11
Denver Health and Hospitals Foundation

Support the work of the denver health and hospital authority in its mission to sustain and advance the health and well-being of denver, colorado and the rocky mountain region.

—
12
Craig Hospital Foundation

Craig Hospital Foundation supports Craig Hospital in achieving its goals through philanthropy by raising funds and dedicating resources to further advance the needs of Craig Hospital and the community it serves. The Foundation supports…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Colorado Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Union Aid Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $298,334 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADONEW MEXICO TECH: $182,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO TECHFLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $130,000 · OtherFLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $100,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGBRADFORD LOCAL CHARITIES: $61,000 · OtherBRADFORD LOCAL CHARITIESMORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATN-YR 23: $50,000 · OtherHAS US ADMINISTRATION OFFICE: $45,000 · Other+13 more: $201,833 · Other+13 moreTHE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $210,000 · HealthTHE MORGAN ADA…NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10,000 · HealthTransplant Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $220,000 · AnimalsDENVER ZOOLOG…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $116,466 · EducationBRADFORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationDENVER ACADEMY INC: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 · EducationColorado Museum of Natural History: $110,000 · Arts & CultureMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesUnion Aid Society: $12,500 · Human Services
Other$1,068,167Health$230,500Animals$220,000Education$141,466Arts & Culture$110,000Human Services$62,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $220,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetFLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $130,000 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $116,466 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Museum of Natural History: $110,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTransplant Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBRADFORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDENVER ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRADFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MORGAN ADAMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLICKINGER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Union Aid Society ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SANTA FE PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Transplant Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRADFORD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds BRADFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glendorn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glendorn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Glendorn Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Glendorn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glendorn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph