Skip to content

· Private foundation

Glaser Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
52
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$318kHuman Services$117kReligion$87kHealth$52kArts & Culture$37kFood & Nutrition$19kEnvironment$8kPhilanthropy$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k50 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$871k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER$21,657
CHISOLM HEIGHTS BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
CWTX$8,244
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$6,500
CREATIVE ARTS CENTER$5,000
CULTIV8COMMUNITY$5,000
EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$4,800
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$4,200
AUSTIN COLLEGE$4,000
PARIS JR COLLEGE$2,500
GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE$2,300
SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,100
YOUNG LIFE$2,000
LANE OF ROSES$2,000
KOOL LUNCH PROGRAM$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE BAPTIST CENTER FOR GLOBAL CONCERNS: $2k → 10%FANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 14%FANNIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%FANNIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%FANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 14%FANNIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $500 → 14%FANNIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $500 → 14%FANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 14%FANNIN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $300 → 14%FANNIN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $300 → 14%FANNIN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $300 → 14%FANNIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $250 → 14%FANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $250 → 14%FANNIN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $250 → 14%FANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $250 → 14%FANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WY
IA
UT
MO
KY
VA
AZ
KS
AR
TN
SC
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$612k · 78 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
48

Total granted

$612k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+12%

Still filing today

27%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthReligionCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AUSTIN COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +8%
  • DB
    DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • GH
    GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • US
    UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • EB
    ECTOR BEAUTIFICATION ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-DALLAS
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
2
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
3
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
4
Hardin-Simmons University

The mission of hardin-simmons university is to be a community dedicated to providing excellence in education enlightened by christian faith and values.

Education
5
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
6
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
9
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
10
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin College; the most unlike its peers is American Legion Post 283. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
23/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-COMMERCE: $41,050 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-COMMERCECHISOLM HEIGHTS BAPTIST CHURCH: $36,000 · OtherCHISOLM HEIGHTS BAPTIST CHURCHGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE: $28,301 · OtherGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGETEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $26,200 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $20,550 · OtherCHISHOLM HEIGHTS BAPTIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherCREATIVE ARTS CENTER: $18,050 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $16,650 · Other+94 more: $215,645 · Other+94 moreFANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $94,813 · Civil RightsFANNIN COUNTY CH…AUSTIN COLLEGE: $28,650 · EducationAUSTIN COLLE…DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $10,100 · EducationDALLAS BAPTI…GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 · EducationGRANT HALLIB…EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $6,450 · EducationEAST TEXAS B…OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $4,150 · EducationOKLAHOMA BAP…HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $3,300 · EducationTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,600 · Education+14 more: $9,150 · Education+14 moreCOMMUNITY WELL TX: $33,665 · HealthWOMEN ROCK INC: $2,250 · HealthCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA: $2,000 · HealthCultiv8Community: $7,500 · Human ServicesFANNIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $3,250 · Human ServicesFANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $3,250 · Human ServicesBAPTIST CENTER FOR GLOBAL CONCERNS: $2,000 · Human ServicesFANNIN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $1,150 · Human ServicesLANE OF ROSES INC: $6,000 · ReligionEXPRESSIONS OF EMMANUEL INC: $5,000 · ReligionTEXOMA REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Philanthropy
Other$422,446Civil Rights$94,813Education$73,900Health$37,915Human Services$17,150Religion$11,000Philanthropy$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $94,813 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY WELL TX: $33,665 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE: $28,650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $10,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCultiv8Community: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $6,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLANE OF ROSES INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTEXOMA REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetEXPRESSIONS OF EMMANUEL INC: $5,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $4,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS SHELTER: $4,200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $4,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $3,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFANNIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $3,250 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetMANNA HOUSE: $3,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $3,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN ROCK INC: $2,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAPTIST CENTER FOR GLOBAL CONCERNS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBONHAM AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,700 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCROWLEY'S RIDGE COLLEGE: $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFANNIN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $1,150 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOUACHITA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorwich University: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHERMAN COMMUNITY PLAYERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity University: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Edwards University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSamford University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern New Hampshire University: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 283: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY WELL TX ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cultiv8Community ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LANE OF ROSES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXOMA REGIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EXPRESSIONS OF EMMANUEL INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund IncTX26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Higher Education Foundation · Texoma Community Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · M W and Fair Miller Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Jack and Charlotte Owen Education Scholarship · Thurman Crawford Charitable Trust · The Buddy Bostick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glaser Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glaser Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Norwich University: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 135 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glaser Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph