· Private foundation
Gladys Bevil Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE FREE MAMMOGRAM PROGRAM | $10,000 |
| GIRLS HAVEN | $7,500 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF BEAUMONT | $5,000 |
| SOME OTHER PLACE INC | $5,000 |
| ANAYAT HOUSE INC | $4,000 |
| GARTH HOUSE MICKEY MEHAFFY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY PROGRAM INC | $3,500 |
| COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC | $3,000 |
| IEA - INSPIRE ENCOURAGE ACHIEVE | $2,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- JRJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program9× · 2017–2025 · $82k · revenue +63%
- GHGIRLS' HAVEN INC9× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +88%
- GHGarth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +42%
Funded once
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Child Advocacy
Grace House exists to rescue and advocate for women and families at risk.
The mission of Scottys House is to provide safety, healing and justice for children victimized by abuse through professional assessment, counseling and education in a compassionate and collaborative approach.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.
The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.
The mission of STARR of Hope, in collaboration with the community resources, is to provide prevention, intervention, and advocacy for women and children who experience domestic abuse or violence in Starr, Zapata and Jim Hogg Counties.
LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.
Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.
To provide a child-oriented, multidisciplinary forensice interview enviroment facility and counseling center for victims of abuse and their families.
Our mission is to meet the spiritual and practical needs of the families of prisoners. We strive to provide a safe and caring home in whichfamilies can rest while visiting loved ones currently incarcerated in the adjacent prison system.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
- Who funds GIRLS' HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds Some Other Place ↗
- Who funds Anayat House Inc ↗
- Who funds Garth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc ↗
- Who funds IEA - INSPIRE ENCOURAGE ACHIEVE ↗
- Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Southeast Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds Boys Haven of America Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bob and Karen Wortham Charitable Fou · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · Mechia Foundation · Mildred Yount Manion Charitable Foundation · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Simpson-Omohundro Foundation Omohundro Educational Trust · The Morgan Charitable Foundation · Juanita Parker Corbin Charitable Tr Charitable Trust · Young Mens Business League of Beaumont · Wilton and Effie Hebert Foundation · B a and E W Steinhagen Benevolent Trust
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Gladys Bevil Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gladys Bevil Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Gladys Bevil’s filings →